Hybrid Project-Based Learning course approach from face-to-face and remote experiences

Saul Delabrida 
pp. 44 – 60, download


The Covid-19 pandemic challenged students and educators who quickly migrated face-to-face courses to a remote context. Given this challenge, this paper documents the experience of a Project-Based Learning course originally proposed to a face-to-face and adjusted to the remote context. It is a wearable computing course centralizing on mixed reality technologies and user studies evaluation. The adopted methodology is student-centered based on PjBL practices, emphasizing the Human-Computer interaction subject was applied six times, three times face-to-face, and three times remotely between 2019 and 2021. This paper describes the educator’s experiences, learnings, and directions for the arrangement of other PjBL courses.

Keywords: Project-Based Learning, Student-Centered Learning, Hybrid learning, Mixed Reality, Wearable Devices, Design Thinking


1. S. Seneviratne et al., ‘A Survey of Wearable Devices and Challenges,’ in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2573-2620, Fourthquarter 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2731979
2. Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, Fumio Kishino, ‘Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum,’ Proc. SPIE 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, (21 December 1995). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
3. Haas, John. ‘A history of the unity game engine.’ Diss. WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE (2014).
4. Dilekli, Yalçın. ‘Project-based learning.’ Paradigm shifts in 21st century teaching and learning. IGI Global, 2020. 53-68. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3146-4.ch004
5. Noordin, Muhammad Khair, et al. ‘Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in engineering education: a comparison.’ Proceedings of the IETEC 11 (2011).
6. Brown, Tim, 1954- and Barry. Katz, Change By Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. [New York]: Harper Business, 2009.
7. E. Kucera, O. Haffner and R. Leskovský, ‘Interactive and virtual/mixed reality applications for mechatronics education developed in unity engine,’ 2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I), 2018, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERI.2018.8337533
8. Dey, Arindam, et al. ‘A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014.’ Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018): 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
9. Delabrida, Saul, et al. ‘A low cost optical see-through hmd-do-it-yourself.’ 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0087
10. Freire, Paulo, 1921-1997. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum, 2000.
11. Obidah, R., Bein, D. (2019). Game Based Learning Using Unreal Engine. In: Latifi, S. (eds) 16th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations (ITNG 2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 800. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14070-0_72
12. M. Billinghurst and T. Starner, ‘Wearable devices: new ways to manage information,’ in Computer, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57-64, Jan. 1999, https://doi.org/10.1109/2.738305
13. B. H. Thomas, ‘Have We Achieved the Ultimate Wearable Computer?,’ 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2012, pp. 104-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2012.26
14. Bass, L., Kasabach, C., Martin, R., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., & Stivoric, J. (1997, March). The design of a wearable computer. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 139-146). https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258634
15. Ronald T. Azuma; A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1997; 6 (4): 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
16. Zheng, J. M., K. W. Chan, and Ian Gibson. ‘Virtual reality.’ Ieee Potentials 17.2 (1998): 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/45.666641

back to Table of Contents