Article_snip

M. Uğur Kahraman , Yaren Şekerci , Müge Develier
pp. 95 - 116, view paper, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-059-004), Google Scholar

Submitted on 15 Sep 2023 - Accepted on 23 Jan 2024

Interaction Design and Architecture(s) IxD&A Journal
Issue N. 59, Winter 2023

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into interior design education is a growing trend. This study presents a warm-up assignment where students used AI design tools to develop a concept of contemporary office designs inspired by characters from the TV series “Avrupa Yakas?.” The goal was to prepare students for an office design project while introducing them to AI applications. The AI-generated designs reflected character personalities and aesthetic preferences. Findings show the AI’s capability to translate textual cues into visual designs, but limitations arise due to insufficient definitions in the AI’s memory. The study highlights AI’s potential for assisting in design inspiration but also emphasizes the need for continuous AI database development. This initiative contributes to understanding AI’s role in design education and its evolving impact on creative processes.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Tools, Concept Development, Interior Design, Interior Design Education

CRediT author statement: M. U?ur Kahraman: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft preparation, Writing – review and editing. Yaren ?ekerci: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft preparation, Writing – review and editing. Müge Develier: Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Cite this article as:
Kahraman M., Şekerci Y., Develier M.: Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Interior Design Education: A Case Study on Creating Office Spaces for “Avrupa Yakası” TV Series Characters, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.59, 2023, pp. 95–116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-059-004

References:

1. Hermand, S., & Rajeb, S. B.: Using Design Competition Calls in a “Design Studio” Course. In AMPS CONFERENCE 17.1 (Vol. 17, p. 167), June (2019)
2. Toprak, ?., & Hacihasanoglu, O.: Terms and Concepts on Design Studio in the Research Articles of 2010’s. Journal of Design Studio, 1(2), 13-22, (2019)
3. Karacali, A. O.: A Design Studio Workshop Proposal for Comparable Evaluation of the First-Year Architecture and Interior Design Students. Journal of Design Studio, 2(2), 183-187, (2020). DOI: 10.46474/jds.814379
4. Fak?baba Dedeo?lu, E, & Yalç?n, M.: Implications of Digitalized Interior Architectural Distance Education. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 5085-5092, (2022). DOI:10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S10.622
5. Mohamed, K. E.: An instructive model of integrating sustainability into the undergraduate design studio. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338, 130591, (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130591
6. Demirta?, G.: Durum Komedilerinde Set Dekorlar?n?n Göstergebilimsel Yöntemle Analizi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Karatay Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü E?itim Enstitüsü Mimarlik Anabilim Dal?, (2022)
7. Çelenk, Z.: Yerli Durum Komedilerinde Sürdürülebilirlik Problemi: “Avrupa Yakas?” Örne?i. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Radyo, Televizyon, Sinema Anabilim Dal?, (2007)
8. Budak, G.: Toplumsal Ele?tiri Olarak Mizah: Gülse Birsel’in Avrupa Yakas? ve Jet Sosyete Dizi Örnekleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Mersin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Radyo, Sinema ve Televizyon Anabilim Dal?, (2021)
9. Sözer, Ç. S.: Gülmecede modern-geleneksel kar??tl???n?n kullan?m?:“Avrupa Yakas?” örne?i Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (2010)
10. Nak??c?, G.: Ofis ?ç Mekan Tasar?m?nda Rengin Kullan?m?. Yüksek Lisans tezi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gaziantep, (2018)
11. Has?rc?, D.: Interior Design Education in Search of Meaning. In ICERI2022 Proceedings (pp. 189-193). IATED, (2022). DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2022.0078
12. Jensen, P. A.: Continuous Briefing and User Participation in Building Projects. In adaptables 2006: International Conference on Adaptability in Design and Construction (pp. 119-123). Eindhoven University of Technology, July (2006).
13. Jensen, P. A.: Inclusive Briefing and User Involvement: Case Study of a Media Centre in Denmark. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(1), 38-49, (2011). DOI: 10.3763/aedm.2010.0124
14. Norman, D. A. & Draper, S. W. (Editors): User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (pp.87-124). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, (1986). DOI: 10.1201/b15703
15. Weale, M. J., Whiteside, A., Danford, A., & Day, S.: User evaluation studies in the design process. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, 3(1), 45-52, (1977). DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.1977.tb00426.x
16. McGraw, E. T.: France’s Pompidou Center: A Case for User Evaluation. Journal of Interior Design, 4(1), 3-18, 1978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.1978.tb00483.x
17. Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D. & Preece, J.: User-Centered Design. In Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. (in press), 445-456, (2004)
18. Veitch, J. A., Hine, D. W., & Gifford, R.: End users ‘knowledge, beliefs, and preferences for lighting. Journal of Interior Design, 19(2), 15-26, (1993). DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.1993.tb00159.x
19. Havenhand, L. K.: A View from the Margin: Interior Design. Design Issues, 20(4), 32-42, (2004). DOI: 10.1162/0747936042312002
20. Svidt, K., & Sørensen, J. B.: Development of a Virtual Reality Solution for End User Involvement in Interior Design. In ECAADe: Conferences (Vol. 2, pp. 541-546), (2016). DOI: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.2.541
21. Hasell, M. J., Arch, D., Zhu, Y., & Arch, M.: Creating Habitable Spaces–Participation, Inquiry and Practice. 1. Teaching Time: Distance Education versus Face-to-Face Instruction 9 By Dr. Diane M. Bender, Jeanneane Wood, John D. Vredevoogd 2. Interior Design in K-12: A Framework and Expanded 11 Model of Integration, 13, (2003)
22. Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, M., & Al-Hussein, M.: User-centered interior finishing material selection: An immersive virtual reality-based interactive approach. Automation in Construction, 106, 102884, (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102884
23. Payne, S. R., Mackrill, J., Cain, R., Strelitz, J., & Gate, L.: Developing interior design briefs for health-care and well-being centres through public participation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(4), 264-279, (2015). DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2014.923288
24. CIDA.: Future Vision 2021. https://www.accredit-id.org/futurevision2021, access date: 09.08.2023, (2021)
25. CIDA.: Professional Standards 2022. https://www.accredit-id.org/. . access date: 30.07.23, (2022)
26. Kahraman, Z. E. H.: Using User-Centered Design Approach in Course Design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2071-2076, (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.283
27. McAuliffe, M.: Considering the role of presence in the conceptual design of interior architectural environments. In PRESENCE 2007: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence (pp. 311-319). The International Society for Presence Research (ISPR), (2007)
28. Noorian, T.: Personalization of space in office environments (Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)), (2009)
29. Xu, J. F., & Zhang, H. N.: Modern office furniture design based on ergonomics. Advanced Materials Research, 628, 57-62, (2013). DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.628.57
30. Adu, G., Adu, S., Effah, B., Frimpong-Mensah, K., & Darkwa, N. A.: Office furniture design–correlation of worker and chair dimensions. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(3), 709-715, (2014)
31. Colenberg, S., Jylhä, T., & Arkesteijn, M.: The Relationship Between Interior Office Space and Employee Health and Well-Being–A Literature Review. Building Research & Information, 49(3), 352-366, (2021). DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2019.1710098
32. Harris, R.: The Changing Nature of the Workplace and the Future of Office Space. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 33(5), 424-435, (2015). DOI: 10.1108/JPIF-05-2015-0029
33. Demirba?, O. O., & Demirkan, H.: Privacy Dimensions: A Case Study in the Interior Architecture Design Studio. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 53-64, (2000). DOI:10.1006/jevp.1999.0148
34. Sundstrom, E.: “Symbolic Workspace: Self-identity and Status”, Ch.11in, Work Places. The Psychology of the Physical Environment in Offices and Factories, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, pp.217-51, (1986). DOI: 10.1108/14630010910985922
35. Brunia, S., & Hartjes?Gosselink, A.: Personalization in non?territorial offices: a study of a human need. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(3), 169-182, (2009). DOI: 10.1108/14630010910985922
36. Wells, M. M., Thelen, L., & Ruark, J.: Workspace Personalization and Organizational Culture: Does Your Workspace Reflect You or Your Company?. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 616-634, (2007). DOI: 10.1177/0013916506295602
37. Wells, M., & Thelen, L.: What does your workspace say about you? The influence of personality, status, and workspace on personalization. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 300-321, (2002). DOI: 10.1177/0013916502034003002
38. Wells, M. M.: Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The Role of Office Personalization in Employee and Organizational Well-Being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 239-255, (2000). DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0166
39. Mørch, A. I., & Andersen, R.: Human-Centred AI in Education in the Age of Generative AI Tools. Proceedings http://ceur-ws. org ISSN, 1613, 0073, (2023)
40. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L.: Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Available at SSRN 4337484, (2023). DOI: 10.61969/jai.1337500
41. Zhang, H., Song, H., Li, S., Zhou, M., & Song, D.: A survey of controllable text generation using transformer-based pre-trained language models. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3), 1-37, (2023). DOI: 10.1145/3617680
42. Marcus, G., Davis, E., & Aaronson, S.: A very preliminary analysis of DALL-E 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13807, (2022). DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2204.13807
43. Mardin, G. G., & Sönmez, E.: The Use of Artificial Intelligence In Interior Design Education and It’s Future. Interior Architectural Issues-Design, History & Education, 81, (2023).
44. Bayrak, E.: Evaluation of The Interaction of Artificial Intelligence and Space Design in Today’s Design Education. Hacettepe University Institute of Fine Arts, Master’s Thesis, (2022).
45. Andersen, R., Mørch, A. I., & Litherland, K. T.: Collaborative Learning with Block-Based Programming: Investigating Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9), 1830-1847, (2022). DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2083981
46. Takvim, https://www.takvim.com.tr/saklambac/2019/07/08/sureyya-yalcina-gulduren-benzetme-sahika-kocarslanlidan-rol-calmis
47. Twitter, https://twitter.com/ahikaKoarslanl2
48. PDL, https://www.personality-database.com/profile/58566/ahika-koarslanl-avrupa-yakas-mbti-personality-type
49. Henneberger, J. E.: Productivity growth below average in the household furniture industry. Monthly Labor Review, 101(11), 23-29, (1978)
50. Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21 st Century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-105, (1991). DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
51. Bergdoll, B., & Beyer, J. H.: ” Marcel Breuer: Bauhaus Tradition, Brutalist Invention”: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 74, no. 1 (Summer, 2015). Metropolitan Museum of Art, (2016).
52. Fandom, https://avrupa-yakasi.fandom.com/tr/wiki/Burhan_Alt%C4%B1ntop%27un_Evi
53. Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=QnbYJWeD8Bg
54. Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jcp-0G6uVg
55. Özgüç, T.: Excavations at Alt?ntepe. BELLETEN, 25(98), 269-290. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ttkbelleten/issue/76074/1259223, (1961)
56. Franses, M.: An introduction to early Turkish rugs. ‘In Praise of God, Anatolian Rugs in Transylvanian Churches 1500–1750’, exhibition catalogue, 19 April to 19 August 2007, Sakip Sabanci Museum, Istanbul, pp. 39–49, (2007).
57. Shemelina, T. A., & Solomenko, A.G.: Features Victorian Style in Interior Design. Journals National Aviation University. No.2. 140-147, (2012). DOI: 10.18372/2415-8151.2.6181
58. Pinterest, https://tr.pinterest.com/pin/657244139376470716/
59. Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE-7nUSrVjs&list=PLDBem4OrlfANR0nii1Om0MGYGYW5f97Iz&index=1
60. Milliyet, https://www.milliyet.com.tr/molatik/galeri/molatik-yillar-sonra-avrupa-yakasi-84289/8
61. Braun, R.: “The lobby as a living room: what interior design innovations and products do luxury hotels implement to attract guests to their lobby?”, Bachelor Thesis, Modul University, Vienna, (2011)
62. Süslü Sözlük, https://www.suslusozluk.com/cem-onaran
63. DH Forum, https://forum.donanimhaber.com/avrupa-yakasi-hayran-grubu-2004-2009–29412922
64. Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Llbt5IT1U4
65. Koschenz, M., & Lehmann, B.: Development of a thermally activated ceiling panel with PCM for application in lightweight and retrofitted buildings. Energy and buildings, 36(6), 567-578, (2004). DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.029

back to Table of Contents