Georgina Guillen-Hanson, Mattia Thibault
pp. 193 - 215, view paper, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-061-007), Google Scholar
Issue N. 61, Summer 2024
Play in, with, and within the city is a topic that includes notions such as our right to the city and the challenges that current urban layouts and settlements largely determined by socioeconomic circumstances bring about. Through the lens of Gehl’s Urban Quality Criteria and Max-Neef’s Human Development Scale, this paper explores the evidence of how playfulness enabled the satisfaction of human needs as a part of the adaptation process to the ”new” interactions with and within the city, taking the dynamics that emerged after the implementation of the COVID-19 pandemic as a reference. This paper argues that issues hindering our right to the city can be reframed and understood differently from a human-need satisfaction approach. This appreciation can help harness the pandemic’s learnings about play in urban environments, contextualize them among ongoing global crises (i.e., war in Europe, climate change), and support reshaping relationships with and within the city inspired by playfulness.
CRediT author statement: Georgina Guillen-Hanson: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft preparation. Mattia Thibault: Validation, Writing – review and editing
Cite this article as:
Guillen-Hanson G., Thibault M.: Knee deep in the hoopla: rebuilding our cities beyond rocks and walls. A review of human-need satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic., Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.61, 2023, pp. 193–215, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-061-007
References:
1. Huizinga, Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd., 1949.
2. Masek, L. and Stenros, J. (2021) “The Meaning of Playfulness: A Review of the Contemporary Definitions of the Concept across Disciplines”, Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 12(1), pp. 13–37. doi: 10.7557/23.6361.
3. Stevens, Q.: The ludic city: exploring the potential of public spaces, Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961803
4. Nijholt, A.: Playable cities, Singapore: Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3
5. Thibault, M.: ReClaim: Urban Gamification for City Reappropriations, Tampere University Press, (2021).
6. Orum, A.M.: The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, John Wiley & Sons, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446
7. Lefebvre, H.: Le droit a` la ville, Anthropos, (1968).
8. Sadler, S.: The situationist city, MIT press, (1999).
9. Ladiana, D.: Urban dystopias: Cities that exclude, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. Pp. 619–627. (2017) doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N4-619-627
10. Thibault, M. Ludosemiotica. Il gioco tra segni, testi, pratiche e discorsi, Rome: Aracne. (2020)
11. Leorke, D., Owens, M.: Games and Play in the Creative, Smart and Ecological City, Routledge, (2020). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007760
12. Sibbald, S.L., Graham, R., Gilliland, J.: The public health response to ‘do-it-yourself’urbanism, Global health promotion 24 (3) Pp. 68–70. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975915602632
13. Iveson, K. Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city. In City (Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 250–259). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568723. (2011).
14. Hassan, L., Thibault, M.: Critical playable cities, Making Smart Cities More Playable: Exploring Playable Cities. 71–85. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_4
15. Max-Neef, M.A.: Human scale development: conception, application and further reflections (1991).
16. Sepe, M. Covid-19 pandemic and public spaces: improving quality and flexibility for healthier places. Urban Des Int 26, 159–173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00153-x
17. Schuff, S. How Covid-19 demonstrated the importance of public space in cities https://cities-today.com/industry/covid-19-demonstrated-importance-public-space-cities/ (2020)
18. Luger, J., & Lees, L. Revisiting urban public space through the lens of the 2020 global lockdown. In Urban Geography (Vol. 43, Issue 6, pp. 797–809). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2073084 (2022).
19. Hjorth, L., Lammes, S.: Playing with the ‘new normal’of life under coronavirus, The Conversation 6 (2020).
20. Kleinman, E., Chojnacki, S., Seif El-Nasr, M.: The gang’s all here: How people used games to cope with covid19 quarantine, in: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pp. 1–12. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445072
21. Heljakka, K.: Liberated through teddy bears: resistance, resourcefulness, and resilience in toy play during the covid-19 pandemic, International Journal of Play 10 (4) Pp. 387–404. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2021.2005402
22. Tonkin, A., Whitaker, J.: Play and playfulness for health and wellbeing: A panacea for mitigating the impact of coronavirus (covid 19), Social Sciences & Humanities Open 4 (1) 100142. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100142
23. Maslow A.H. (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4) , pp. 370-396, 10.1037/h0054346
24. Sheikh, W. T., & van Ameijde, J. (2022). Promoting livability through urban planning: A comprehensive framework based on the “theory of human needs.” In Cities (Vol. 131, p. 103972). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972
25. Aly, D., Hassan, D. K., Kamel, S. M., & Hamhaber, J. (2018). Human needs as an approach to designed landscapes. Journal of Natural Resources and Development, 8, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.5027/jnrd.v8i0.03
26. Song, X., Cao, M., Zhai, K., Gao, X., Wu, M., Yang, T.: The effects of spatial planning, well-being, and behavioural changes during and after the covid-19 pandemic, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3. 686706. (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.686706
27. Makkonen, T., Mitze, T.: The geography of innovation in times of crisis: a comparison of rural and urban rdi patterns during covid-19, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. Pp. 1–23. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2093252
28. Gkiotsalitis, K., Cats, O.: Public transport planning adaption under the covid-19 pandemic crisis: literature review of research needs and directions, Transport Reviews 41 (3) Pp. 374–392. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1857886
29. Lashgari, Y.S., Shahab, S.: The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on retail in city centres, Sustainability 14 (18) 11463 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811463
30. Vicino, T.J., Voigt, R.H., Kabir, M., Michanie, J.: Urban crises and the covid-19 pandemic: An analytical framework for metropolitan resiliency, Urban Planning 7 (3) Pp. 4–14 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5376
31. Lekic Glavan, O., Nikolic, N., Folic, B., Vitosevic, B., Mitrovic, A., Kosanovic, S.: Covid-19 and city space: Impact and perspectives, Sustainability 14 (3) 1885 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031885
32. Thibault, M., Baer, M.F.: Urban gamification during lockdown and social isolation-from the teddy bear challenge to window expeditions, GamiFIN Conference, CEUR-WS. org, (2021)
33. Sorlin, S.: Humanities of transformation: From crisis and critique towards the emerging integrative humanities, Research Evaluation 27 (4) Pp. 287–297. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx030
34. Gehl, J. (2013) Cities for people. Island Press.
35. Gehl, J., Gemzøe, L., Kirknaes, S., & Søndergaard, B. S. (2006). New city life. The Danish Architectural Press.
36. Dietrich, U., & Erto, G. K. (2017). Liveable public Urban spaces: Criteria for assessment and design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 223, 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC170241
37. Buttimer, A., Social Space and the Planning of Residential Areas. In Environment and Behavior (Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 343–344). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657200400309 (1972).
38. Schouten, B., van der Spek, E., Harmsen, D., and Bartholomeus, E. (2019). “Chapter 12: The playful scientist: stimulating playful communities for science practice,” in The Playful Citizen, eds R. Glas, S. Lammes, M. Lange, J. Raessens, and I. Vries (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048535200-014
39. Nijholt, A., (ed.). (2019). Making Smart Cities More Playable. Exploring Playable Cities. Gaming Media and Social Effects Series. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3
40. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Nicholson-Smith, D. (trans). Blackwell: Oxford.
41. Thibault, M., Buruk, O., Hassan, L., & Hamari, J. (2021). Anagenesis: A framework for a gameful, playful and democratic future smart cities. In M. Vesa (Ed.), Organizational Gamification: Theories and Practices of Ludified Work in Late Modernity (pp. 201-229). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429316722
42. Silvennoinen, H., Kuliga, S., Herthogs, P., Recchia, D. R., & Tunçer, B. (2022). Effects of Gehl’s urban design guidelines on walkability: A virtual reality experiment in Singaporean public housing estates. In Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science (Vol. 49, Issue 9, pp. 2409–2428). SAGE Publications.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221091822
43. Innocent, T., Stevens, Q.: Urban play as catalyst for social wellbeing postpandemic, Frontiers in Computer Science 3. 634145 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.634145
44. Sacchetto, D., Raviolo, M., Beltrando, C., Tommasoni, N.: Covid-19 surge capacity solutions: our experience of converting a concert hall into a temporary hospital for mild and moderate covid-19 patients, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 16 (3) pp. 1273–1276. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.412
45. Leorke, D.: Super street arcade: Yawa and yomeci. www.playablecitymelbourne.com (2022)
46. Taylor, A., Music and encouragement from balconies around the world. https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2020/03/music-and-encouragement-from-balconies-around-world/608668/ (2020)
47. Hardman, M., Look out behind the bust stop, here come guerrilla gardeners digging up an urban revolution. https://theconversation.com/look-out-behind-the-bus-stop-here-come-guerrilla-gardeners-digging-up-an-urban-revolution-29225 (2014)
48. Rasbash, Z., Huxley, J., Guerrilla Gardening: taking back the city one seed bomb at time. https://shado-mag.com/do/guerrilla-gardening-taking-back-the-city-one-seed-bomb-at-a-time/ (2021)
49. Bengtsson, T.T, Bom, L.H., Fynbo, L.: Playing apart together: Young people’s online gaming during the covid-19 lockdown, Young 29 (4 suppl) S65–S80. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211032018
50. Bliss L., Martin, J.L. How 2020 remapped your worlds.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-coronavirus-lockdown-neighborhood-maps/
51. Barron, C., Emmett, M. J., Patte, M. M., Higham, S., & Bulgarelli, D. Indoor play during a global pandemic: commonalities and diversities during a unique snapshot in time. In International Journal of Play (Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 365–386). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2021.2005396 (2021).
52. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative research in psychology 3 (2) p. 77–101 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
53. Grant, M. J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health information & libraries journal 26 (2) Pp. 91–108 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
54. Hookway, N. (2008) ‘”Entering the blogosphere”: some strategies for using blogs in social research’ Qualitative Research, 8(1) 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085298
55. Shove, E.: The shadowy side of innovation: unmaking and sustainability, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4) Pp. 363–375 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663961
56. UNstats, Sustainable development goal 11 – sustainable cities and communities:
un.org/sdgs/report/2019/goal-11/ (2019).
57. Statista a. Smart phone users in the world projections to 2028.
https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1143723/smartphone-users-in-the-world
58. Statista b. Smart phone penetration per country.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/539395/smartphone-penetration-worldwide-by-country/
59. Kelly, M.P.F.: Slums, ghettos, and other conundrums in the anthropology of lower income urban enclaves, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 749 (1) Pp. 219–233 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb17396.x
60. Alvarez-Rivadulla, M.J.: Golden ghettos: gated communities and class residential segregation in montevideo, uruguay, Environment and Planning A 39 (1) Pp. 47–63 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1068/a38469
61. Brunn, S.D.: Gated minds and gated lives as worlds of exclusion and fear, GeoJournal 66 (1-2) Pp. 5–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9012-5
62. Lefebvre, H.: La production de l’espace, L’Homme et la societe 31 (1) Pp. 15–32 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1974.1855
63. Leuzzi, M.: Art in slums. www.blog. artinslums.wordpress.com (2012)
64. D’Allant, J.: How art helps slum residents in the global south. The Huffington Post, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-art-helps-the-global-south_b_3943767 (2013)
65. Rayomand, Are slums dark and dangerous? this artist is using paint to change your mind, in the better india. www.thebetterindia.com/132477/misaalmumbai-art-slums-rouble-nagi (2018)
66. Stevens, Q., Leorke, D., Innocent, T., Tolentino, C.: The playful parklet: a research report for the city of Stonnington, City of Stonnington (2022).
67. Yeung, P.: ‘it’s a beautiful thing’: how one Paris district rediscovered conviviality., www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/14/its-a-beautiful-thinghow-one-paris-district-rediscovered-conviviality
68. Frenzel, F., Koens, K., Steinbrink, M., Rogerson, C.M.: Slum tourism: State of the art, Tourism Review International 18 (4) Pp. 237–252. (2015) https://doi.org/10.3727/154427215X14230549904017
69. LostSoulColo69, www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=knee+deep+in+the+hoopla
70. Liebich, L. From a human doing to a human being? Exploring the potential of laziness through exercises in doing nothing. Aalto University. School of Arts, Design and Architecture. (2021).
71. Fuest, L. Poetik des Nicht(s)tuns: Verweigerungsstrategien in der Literatur seit 1800. München: Wilhelm Fink . (2008). https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846746141
72. Calcagno, P., Consilvio, A., Di Febbraro, A., Sacco, N.: Reshaping metro station spaces to improve social distancing during covid-19 pandemic. 7th MT-ITS, Pp. 1–6. IEEE, (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/MT-ITS49943.2021.9529315
73. Tait, A.: Paths of desire: lockdown has lent a new twist to the trails we leave
behind. www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2020/jun/14/paths-of-desire-lockdown-has-lent
74. Wake, S.: Rewind on imagining future cities through drama and design (2020).
75. Reutlinger, C., Unsichtbare kindergeographien: Dominierende denkfiguren von kinderorten in der stadt, sub\\urban. zeitschrift für kritische stadtforschung 9 (3/4) Pp. 13–32. (2021)
https://doi.org/10.36900/suburban.v9i3/4.653
76. Chaudhary, N., Kapoor, S., Pillai, P.: ‘it was peers and playgrounds that were missing, not play’: young children in northern indian homes during the pandemic, International Journal of Play 10 (4) Pp. 405–419. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2021.2005397
77. Stevens, Q., Awepuga, F., Dovey, K.: Temporary and tactical urbanism in Australia: Perspectives from practice, Urban Policy and Research 39 (3) Pp. 262–275. (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2021.1963225
78. Daly, J., Dovey, K., Stevens, Q.: We can’t let coronavirus kill our cities. here’s how we can save urban life, The Conversation 5 (2020).
79. Hadani, H., Vey, J.: Scaling playful learning: how cities can reimagine public spaces to support children and families (2020).
80. Ortiz, C. (2022). Cultivating Urban Storytellers: A Radical Co-Creation to Enact Cognitive Justice for/in Self-Built Neighbourhoods. In Urban Planning (Vol. 7, Issue 3). Cogitatio. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5430
81. Ferentinos, P. (2022). Urban fragments ‘on hold’: Reflections of COVID-19 in the urban Greek environment. In JAWS: Journal of Arts Writing by Students (Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 97–118). Intellect. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaws_00033_1
82. Poplin, A., de Andrade, B., & de Sena, Í. (2023). Let’s discuss our city! Engaging youth in the co-creation of living environments with digital serious geogames and gamified storytelling. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(4), 1087-1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221133828
83. Trnka, S.: From lockdown to ra ?hui and teddy bears in windows: Initial responses to covid-19 in aotearoa/new zealand, Anthropology Today. Pp11–13 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12603
84. Matjeka, L.P., Svanæs, D., Wang, A.I.: Turning eight family homes into interactive, pervasive playgrounds during the covid-19 pandemic lockdown, Frontiers in Computer Science 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.822337
85. Landa, G.R., iniciativas ciudadanas ante covid-19: ¿resultado de generación espontánea o producto del capital social de la CDMX?. www.tinyurl.com/mvwz9r74