ICT-Mediated Learning as a Form of Socio-Emotional Support for Older Adults

Carmen Llorente-Barroso, Olga Kolotouchkina, Luis Mañas-Viniegra, Mónica Viñarás-Abad
pp. 8 – 33, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-054-001)

Abstract

The adverse effects of the pandemic on the emotional state of older adults have fuelled the debate regarding their digital exclusion and the need to promote their genuine inclusion. During this period, technology and technology-mediated learning have improved the quality of life of older adults in many ways. The purpose of this research is to identify the socio-emotional role of technology-assisted learning programmes for seniors ever since the onset of the pandemic. The results reveal a positive impact on the emotional well-being of older adults from these forms of learning. Participants highlight the value of intergenerational socialisation enabled by these learning formats in the process of self-learning and reciprocal learning that takes place on platforms such as YouTube and WhatsApp. However, a preference among seniors for in-person learning has also been observed, which is sometimes linked to a certain level of technological anxiety. 

Keywords: Older adults, active ageing, ICT-based learning, socio-emotional support, e-learning, blended learning.

References

1. Llorente-Barroso, C., Kolotouchkina, O., Mañas-Viniegra, L.: The enabling role of ICT to mitigate the negative effects of emotional and social loneliness of the elderly during COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), pp. 3923:1–3923:19, (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083923
2. Nakagomi, A., Shiba, K., Kondo, K., Kawachi, I.: Can online communication prevent depression among older people? A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Applied Gerontology, 41(1), pp. 167–175, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820982147
3. Newman, M.G., Zainal, N.H.: The value of maintaining social connections for mental health in older people, Lancet Public Health, 5(1), e12–e13, (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30253-1
4. Taipale, S.: Intergenerational connections in digital families, Springer, Cham, (2019)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11947-8
5. Hošnjak, A.M., Pavlović, A.: Older adults knowledge about using smart technology during the covid-19 crisis-a qualitative pilot study, Ifac Papersonline, 54(13), pp. 675–679, (2021)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.529
6. Hargittai, E., Dobransky, K.: Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults’, Canadian Journal of Communication., 42(2), pp. 195–212, (2017)https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176
7. Vulpe, S., Crăciun, A.: Silver surfers from a European perspective: Technology communication usage among European seniors, European Journal of Ageing, 17(1), pp. 125–134, (2020)https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00520-2
8. Sánchez-Valle, M., Llorente-Barroso, C., Alcalá-Abad, L. (2022): Perceptions and attitudes of Spanish “Digital Seniors” towards e-Government, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1), pp. 1–19, (2022)https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.297228
9. Ferreira, S., Veloso, A.I.: Older adults in ICT contexts: Recommendations for developing tutorials, in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for the elderly and technology acceptance. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11592, pp. 376–387. Springer, Cham, (2019)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_27
10. Czaja S.J, Sharit J.: Designing training and instructional programs for older adults. CRC Press, Boca Raton, (2012)https://doi.org/10.1201/b13018
11. Martín-García, A.V., Muñoz-Rodríguez, J.M., Serrate-González, S., Murciano-Hueso, A.: Intention of participating in e-learning university programs for senior citizens. Profile indentificaion using segmentation analysis, Pedagogia Social, (39), 105–122, (2021)https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2021.39.07
12. Tsai, C.H., Romera-Rodriguez, G., Li, N., Robert, J., Serpi, A., Carroll, J.M.: Experiencing the transition to remote teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal – IxD&A, 46, pp. 70–87, (2020)https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-046-004
13. Bai, X., He, Y., Kohlbacher, F. Older people’s adoption of e-learning services: A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers, Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 41(3), pp. 291–307, (2020)https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2018.1469488
14. Cerna, K., Paluch, R., Bäumer, F. Ertl, T., Müller, C.: Transformation of HCI co-research with older adults: Researchers’ positionality in the COVID-19 pandemic, Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal – IxD&A, 50, pp. 27–47, (2021)https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-050-002
15. Casanova, G., Rolandi, E., Vaccaro, R., Pettinato, L., Colombo, M., Guaita, A.: New older users’ attitudes toward social networking sites and loneliness: The case of the oldest-old residents in a small Italian city, Social Media + Society, 7(4), pp. 1–13, (2021)https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211052905
16. Carenzio, A., Ferrari, S., Rasi, P.: Older people’s media repertoires, digital competences and media literacies: A case study from Italy, Education Sciences, 11, 584, pp. 1–15, (2021)https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100584
17. Harley, D., Fitzpatrick, G.: Youtube and intergenerational communication: The case of Geriatric1927, Universal Access in the Information Society, 8(1), pp. 5–20, (2009)https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0127-y
18. Ragnedda, M.: Conceptualizing digital capital, Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), pp. 2366–2375, (2018)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
19. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M.L., Addeo, F.: Measuring digital capital: An empirical investigation, New Media & Society, 22(5), pp. 793–816, (2020)https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604
20. Van-Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van-Dijk, J.A.G.M.: The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access, New Media & Society, 21(2), pp. 354-375, (2019)https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
21. Hargittai, E.: Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills, First Monday, 7(4), (2002)https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
22. Van-Deursen, A.J.A.M., Helsper, E.J.: The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online?, in Communication and information technologies annual, Vol. 10, pp 29–52, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, (2015)https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
23. Van-Deursen, A.J.A.M, Helsper, E.J.: Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the Internet, New Media & Society, 20(7), pp. 2333–2351, (2018)https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282
24. Nimrod, G.: Older audiences in the digital media environment, Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), pp. 233–249, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1164740
25. Hunsaker, A., Hargittai, E.: A review of Internet use among older adults, New Media & Society, 20(10), pp. 3937–3954, (2018)https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348
26. Olsson, T., Samuelsson, U., Viscovi, D.: At risk of exclusion? Degrees of ICT access and literacy among senior citizens, Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), pp. 55–72, (2019)https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355007
27. Van-Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van-Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Internet skills and the digital divide, New Media & Society, 13(6), pp. 893–911, (2011)https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
28. Hill, R.L., Dickinson, A., Arnott, J.L., Gregor, P., McIver, L.: Older web users’ eye movements: Experience counts. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11), pp. 1151–1160. ACM (2011)https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979115
29. Ivan, L., Loos, E., Bird, I.: The impact of technology generations on older adults’ media use: Review of previous empirical research and a seven-country comparison, Gerontechnology, 19(4), pp. 1–19, (2020)https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.19.04.387
30. Loos, E.: In search of information on websites: A question of age?, in Universal access in human-computer interaction. Users diversity. UAHCI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6766, pp. 196–204. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2011)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21663-3_21
31. Loos, E., Ivan, L.: Not only people are getting old, the new media are too: Technology generations and the changes in new media use, New Media & Society, 0(0), (2022)https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221101783
32. Baker, S., Warburton, J., Hodgkin, S., Pascal, J.: The supportive network: Rural disadvantaged older people and ICT, Ageing & Society, 37(6), pp. 1291–1309, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000350
33. Loos, E.: Senior citizens: Digital immigrants in their own country?, Observatorio (OBS*), 6(1), pp. 1–23, (2012)https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS612012513
34. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., Madden, L.: Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life, Ageing & Society, 23(5), pp. 561–582, (2003)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001302
35. Jones, R.B., Ashurst, E.J., Atkey, J., Duffy, B.: Older people going online: Its value and before-after evaluation of volunteer support, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), e122, (2015)https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3943
36. Ivan, L., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren, Transnational Social Review, 7(1), pp. 41–55, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1277861
37. Freeman, S., Marston, H.R., Olynick, J., Musselwhite, C., Kulczycki, C., Genoe, R., Xiong, B.: Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: Insights from an international, multi-site study, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), pp. 5711:1–5711:14, (2020)https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165711
38. Martínez-Alcalá, C.I., Rosales-Lagarde, A., Alonso-Lavernia, M.A., Ramírez-Salvador, J.A., Jiménez-Rodríguez, B., Cepeda-Rebollar, R.M., López-Noguerola, J.S., Bautista-Díaz, M.L., Agis-Juárez, R.A.: Digital inclusion in older adults: A comparison between face-to-face and blended digital literacy workshops, Frontiers in ICT, 5, 21, (2018)https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00021
39. González, A., Viadel, V., Ramírez, M.P.: ICT learning by older adults and their attitudes toward computer use, Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2015, 849308, (2015)https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/849308
40. Schlomann, A., Even, C., Hammann, T.: How older adults learn ICT – Guided and self-regulated learning in individuals with and without disabilities, Frontiers in Computer Science, 3, 803740, (2022)https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.803740
41. Bernardino, I., Baptista, R.J., Bidarra, J., Mamede, P.: Serious games for seniors: Learning safe behaviors on the web. In: Proccedings of the 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 1–4. IEEE Xplore (2021)http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/11237
42. Fua, K.C., Gupta, S., Pautler, D., Farber, I.: Designing serious games for elders. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 291–297. Foundations of Digital Games (2013)https://bit.ly/3BKrUc6
43. Noble, C., Medin, D., Quail, Z., Young, C., Carter, M.: How does participation in formal education or learning for older people affect wellbeing and cognition? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 7, pp. 1–15, (2021)https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721420986027
44. Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A. (2017): Older people, smartphones and WhatsApp, in Smartphone Cultures, vol. 1, pp. 55–68, Routledge, Abingdon, (2017)https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315307077
45. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning. A call for greater depth and breadth of research, Information Systems Research, 12(1), pp. 1–10, (2001)https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011097
46. Alavi, M.: Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation, MIS Quarterly, 18(2), pp. 159–174, (1994)https://doi.org/10.2307/249763
47. Lipphardt, A.M., Held, P., Leen-Thomele, E., Hain, L.: ICT enhanced learning for older adults: Influencing factors on satisfaction and the role of learning motivation, Gerontechnology, 17(suppl), p. 59s, (2018)https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2018.17.s.059.00
48. Wieczorkowski, J., Fundowicz, K., PopioÅ‚ek, M.: Use of social media by older adults. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Social Media, pp. 330–338. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited (2020)https://bit.ly/3VeGT56
49. Digmayer, C., Jakobs, E.M.: Help features in community-based open innovation contests. Multimodal video tutorials for the elderly. In: Proceedings of 30th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, pp. 79–88. SIGDOC’12 (2012)https://doi.org/10.1145/2379057.2379073
50. Caliandro, A., Garavaglia, E., Sturiale, V., Di-Leva, A.: Older people and smartphone practices in everyday life: An inquire on digital sociality of Italian older users, The Communication Review, 24(1), pp. 47–78, (2021)https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1904771
51. Dias-De-Oliveira, C., Fioravanti, M.L., Pontin-De-Mattos-Fortes, R., Barbosa, E.F.: Accessibility in mobile applications for elderly users: A systematic mapping. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2008)https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659017
52. Sugarman, D.: Networked seniors, in Handbook of smart homes, health care and well-being, pp. 521–528, Springer, Cham, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_46
53. Monroy-Trujillo, A., Padilla-Castillo, G., Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, F.: Sports and hate speech messages on Instagram: The case of Seville FC in the Spanish league, in Hate speech and polarization in participatory society, pp. 237-250, Routledge, London, (2021)https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109891-19
54. Xu, W.: (Non-)stereotypical representations of older people in Swedish authority-managed social media, Ageing and Society, 42(3), pp. 719–740, (2022)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001075
55. Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., De-Crespigny, C., Delmar, C.: Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator, Qualitative Research, 1(2), pp. 16–30, (2011)https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i1.4273
56. Krueger, R.A.: Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Sage, Newbury Park, (1988)
57. Morgan, D.L.: Focus groups, Annual Review of Sociology, 22, pp. 129–152, (1996)https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
58. Tonkiss, F.: Focus groups, in Researching society and culture, pp. 237–255, Sage, London, (2018)
59. Gibbs, A.: Focus groups, Social Research Update, 19, (1997)https://bit.ly/3v0eh4Q
60. Benney, M., Hughes, E.C.: Of sociology and the interview, in Sociological methods, pp. 190–198, Aldine, Chicago, (1970)https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129945
61. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R., DeVault, M.L.: Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, (2016)
62. Abad-Alcalá, L., Llorente-Barroso, C., Sánchez-Valle, M., Viñarás-Abad, M., Pretel-Jiménez, M.: Electronic government and online tasks: Towards the autonomy and empowerment of senior citizens, Profesional de la Información, 26(1), pp. 34–42, (2017). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.04
63. Interviewee 1 (I1) (General Subdirector of Seniors, Madrid City Hall: Personal communication, 11 March (2022)
64. Interviewee 2 (I2) (Academic Coordinator of Complutense University for Seniors): Personal communication, 17 December (2020)
65. Interviewee 3 (I3) (Executive Chairman of Canal Senior, Madrid, Spain): Personal communication, 3 December (2020)
66. Interviewee 4 (I4) (Director of Universitas Senioribus CEU): Personal communication, 10 December (2020)
67. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Sage, Newbury Park, (1990)
68. Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J.: Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, pp. 1–13, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
69. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13, pp. 3–21, (1990)https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
70. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago, (1967)https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
71. Muhr, T.: Atlas.ti. A prototype for the support of text interpretation, Qualitative Sociology, 14(4), pp. 349–371, (1991)https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989645
72. Williams, M., Moser, T.: The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research, International Management Review, 15(1), pp.45–55, (2019)https://bit.ly/3uWHP31
73. Friese, S.: ATLAS.ti 9 Windows. User Manual, https://bit.ly/3vLXPVh, (2021, 23 de julio)
74. Kolotouchkina, O., Llorente-Barroso, C., & Manfredi-Sánchez, J.L.: Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities, Cities, 123, 103613, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103613

back to Table of Contents