Fabian Huber, Nan-Ching Tai, Kuang-Ting Huang
pp. 134 – 146, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-054-006)
Abstract
Mobile navigation systems are getting more and more common, and with the rise of smartphones, nearly everyone has access to them via mobile phone apps. Despite the widespread use of mobile apps for navigation, only few solutions for bicyclists exist. These solutions however rely on the user to either look at their phone screen or wear headphones. This poses a risk to the user’s safety by taking away attention from the road conditions. Prior studies have suggested that a vibrotactile navigation system can perform similarly to already existing visual and auditory solutions. Such a system also seems to be less distracting than existing ones. This study presents a working prototype than can be used to navigate urban environments on a bicycle.
Keywords: Cyclist, Navigation System, Wayfinding, Wearable Vibrotactile Interface, Tangible Interaction Design
References
1. Steltenpohl H., Bouwer A.: Vibrobelt: Tactile Navigation Support for Cyclists Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. pp. 417–426. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2013) https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449450
2. Downs R.M., Stea D.: Maps in minds: Reflections on cognitive mapping, HarperCollins Publishers, (1977) https://doi.org/10.2307/215060
3. Heuten W., Henze N., Boll S., Pielot M.: Tactile Wayfinder: A Non-Visual Support System for Wayfinding Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges. pp. 172–181. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2008)https://doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463179
4. US Smartphone use, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/29/us-smartphone-use
5. Google Maps, https://www.google.com/maps6. BikeCitizens, https://www.bikecitizens.net
7. Waard D. de, Edlinger K., Brookhuis K.: Effects of listening to music, and of using a handheld and handsfree telephone on cycling behaviour Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, pp. 626–637 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.07.001
8. Jones L.A., Sarter N.B.: Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application Human Factors, 50, pp. 90–111 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250638
9. Bolton F., Jalaliniya S., Pederson T.: A Wrist-Worn Thermohaptic Device for Graceful Interruption IxD&A, N.26, pp. 39–54 (2015)
10. Bosman S., Groenendaal B., Findlater J.W., Visser T., de Graaf M., Markopoulos P.: GentleGuide: An Exploration of Haptic Output for Indoors Pedestrian Guidance in Chittaro, L. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. pp. 358–362. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_28
11. Kojima Y., Hashimoto Y., Fukushima S., Kajimoto H.: Pull-navi: a novel tactile navigation interface by pulling the ears ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies on – SIGGRAPH ’09. pp. 1–1. ACM Press, New Orleans, Louisiana (2009), https://doi.org/10.1145/1597956.1597975
12. Kammoun S., Bouhani W., Jemni M.: Sole based tactile information display for visually impaired pedestrian navigation Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. pp. 1–4. ACM, Corfu Greece (2015) for Visually Impaired Pedestrian Navigation https://doi.org/10.1145/2769493.2769561
13. Kaul O.B., Rohs M., Mogalle M., Simon B.: Around-the-Head Tactile System for Supporting Micro Navigation of People with Visual Impairments ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 28, pp. 1–35 (2021) 17. Tactile Navigation Display https://doi.org/10.1145/3458021
14. Chittaro L.: Distinctive aspects of mobile interaction and their implications for the design of multimodal interfaces Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 3, pp. 157–165 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-010-0036-2
15. Rümelin S., Rukzio E., Hardy R.: NaviRadar: A Novel Tactile Information Display for Pedestrian Navigation Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. pp. 293–302. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011) https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047234
16. Arduino, https://www.arduino.cc
17. Mapbox, https://www.mapbox.com