Benedicte H. Gangstø and Monica Divitini
pp. 10 – 25, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-062-001)
Abstract
Information Technology (IT) has a critical role in supporting sustainable development. However, there are also various ways in which IT contributes negatively to it. Despite the ever-growing need for IT professionals qualified to take on these challenges, education in sustainability and IT has so far been lacking. IT students need an understanding of the far-reaching implications of IT, and to acknowledge their responsibility for the systems they create, to actively contribute to positive change. To address this need, our research explores how collaborative games can be utilized as a tool to develop IT students’ knowledge and perception of sustainability and its connection with IT. Previous research has found the use of games to teach sustainability promising, and in this paper, we present SustainIT, a 3D collaborative game for IT students. In SustainIT, the players communicate across the past and future to make more sustainable decisions for an IT company. The learning goals of the game are to promote systems thinking, an understanding of the connection between sustainability and IT, and to challenge existing perceptions. Focus has been put on finding effective game elements to promote learning and engagement to support these learning outcomes. In the paper we present the design and the evaluation of the game. The final prototype was evaluated by an expert in sustainability in IT education, and a group of students within the target group. The overall evaluation was positive, with the game being evaluated as relevant and interesting. However, the evaluation also pointed out some challenges with the integration of background information about sustainability into the game. Our findings can inform the development of games aimed at cultivating the understanding of the impacts of IT on sustainability.
Keywords: Sustainability, IT education, Serious Games
CRediT Authors Statement. Benedicte Helen Gangstø: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. Monica Divitini: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Supervision, writing – reviewing & editing
References
1. C. Becker, R. Chitchyan, L. Duboc, et al., “Sustainability design and software: The Karlkrona manifesto,” in 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 2, 2015, pp. 467–476. doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2015.179.
2. C. Becker, S. Betz, R. Chitchyan, et al., “Requirements: The key to sustainability,” IEEE Software, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2016. doi: 10.1109/MS.2015.158.
3. D. Buchinger and M. da Silva Hounsell, “Guidelines for designing and using collaborative- competitive serious games,” Computers Education, vol. 118, pp. 133–149, 2018, issn: 0360-1315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.007.
4. D. Cabrera, L. Cabrera, and C. Lobdell, “Systems thinking,” Evaluation and pro- gram planning, vol. 31, pp. 299–310, Sep. 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007. 12.001.
5. J.-E. Dahlin, R. Fenner, and H. Cruickshank, Critical evaluation of simula-tions and games as tools for expanding student perspectives on sustainability, Jun. 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0064673
6. M. D. Dickey, “Girl gamers: The controversy of girl games and the relevance of female-oriented game design for instructional design,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 785–793, 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467- 8535.2006.00561.x.
7. L. Duboc, B. Penzenstadler, J. Porras, et al., “Requirements engineering for sustainability: An awareness framework for designing software systems for a better tomorrow,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 25, Dec. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00766- 020-00336-y.
8. S. M. Easterbrook, “From computational thinking to systems thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing,” in ICT for Sustainability, 2014.
9. E. Eriksson, M. B. Rivera, B. Hedin, D. Pargman, and H. Hasselqvist, “Systems thinking exercises in computing education: Broadening the scope of ict and sustainability,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ser. ICT4S2020, Bristol, United Kingdom: ACM, 2020, pp. 170–176. doi: 10.1145/3401335.3401670.
10. C. Freitag, M. Berners-Lee, K. Widdicks, B. Knowles, G. S. Blair, and A. Friday, “The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations,” Patterns, vol. 2, no. 9, p. 100 340, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340.
11. A. Hevner, “A three cycle view of design science research,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 19, Jan. 2007.
12. A. Jonassen, “Designing for couch co-op 11 game design guidelines promoting player cooperation,” 2017.
13. T. Laine and R. Lindberg, “Designing engaging games for education: A systematic literature review on game motivators and design principles,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. PP, pp. 1–1, Aug. 2020. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2020. 3018503.
14. O. Leifler, L. Lindblom, M. Svensson, M. Gramf¨alt, and A. J¨onsson, “Teaching sustainability, ethics and scientific writing: An integrated approach,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824. 2020.9274220.
15. D. Meadows, “Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system,” The Sustainability Institute. 1999.
16. K. Oksanen and R. Hämäläinen, “Supporting and facilitating collaborative learning in serious games,” Proc. of the European conf. on games-based learning, pp. 683-690. 2013.
17. K. Oksanen, “Subjective experience and sociability in a collaborative serious game,” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 767–793, 2013. doi: 10.1177/1046878113513079.
18. D. Pargman and E. Eriksson, “”it’s not fair!” – making students engage in sustain-ability,” Proceedings of the EESD13 Conference, Cambridge, 2013.
19. D. Pargman and E. Eriksson, “At odds with a worldview: Teaching limits at a technical university,” Interactions, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 36–39, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1145/3003839.
20. D. Pargman, B. Hedin, and E. Eriksson, “Patterns of engagement: Using a board game as a tool to address sustainability in engineering educations,” Sep. 2016.
21. B. Penzenstadler, A. Raturi, D. Richardson, and B. Tomlinson, “Safety, security, now sustainability: The nonfunctional requirement for the 21st century,” IEEE Software, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 40–47, 2014. doi: 10.1109/MS.2014.22.
22. I. Pollock, B. Alshaigy, A. Bradley, et al., “1.5 degrees of separation: Computer science education in the age of the anthropocene,” in Proceedings of the ITiCSE-WGR ’19, Aberdeen, Scotland Uk: ACM, 2019, pp. 1–25, doi: 10.1145/3344429.3372500.
23. G. W. Scurati, J. W. Nylander, F. Ferrise, and M. Bertoni, “Sustainability aware- ness in engineering design through serious gaming,” Design Science, vol. 8, e12, 2022. doi: 10.1017/dsj.2022.9.
24. M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos, and E. Vareilles, “Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 208, pp. 924–936, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157.
25. L. Booth Sweeney, D. L. Meadows, and G. M. Mehers., “The systems thinking playbook for climate change: A toolkit for interactive learning,” GIZ, Eschborn, 2011.
26. J. Jakub Swacha, Rytis Maskeliunas et al. “Introducing sustainable development topics into computer science education: Design and evaluation of the eco jsity game,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 8, 2021, issn: 2071-1050.
27. T. Voulvoulis. Giakoumis, C. Hunt, et al., “Systems thinking as a paradigm shift for sustainability transformation,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 75,p. 102 544, 2022, issn: 0959-3780. doi: https: // doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . gloen-vcha. 2022.102544.
28. C. Wang and L. Huang, “A systematic review of serious games for collaborative learning: Theoretical framework, game mechanic and efficiency assessment,” Inter- national Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16, p. 88, Mar. 2021. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i06.18495.
29. K. A. Wilson, W. L. Bedwell, E. H. Lazzara, et al., “Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals,” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 217–266, 2009. doi: 10.1177/1046878108321866.