Şeyma Betül Çelik, Muhammet Demirbilek
pp. … – …, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-063-004)
Abstract
Keywords: Robotics programming, Critical thinking, STEM, Coding.
References
1. Slangen, L., van Keulen, H., & Gravemeijer, K.:What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), pp. 449–469 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9130-8
2. Ebelt, K. R.: The effects of a robotics program on students skills in STEM, problem solving and teamwork (2012)
3. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U.: Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), pp.325–346 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
4. Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M.:Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 5 (2004) 17-28. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/bringing-engineering- elementary school/docview/222795467/se-2
5. Resnick, M.:Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational technology research and development, 46(4), pp. 43–55 (1998)
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299672
6. Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., & Martin, F.:Pianos not stereos: Creating computational construction kits (1996)
https://doi.org/10.1145/234757.234762
7. Eguchi, A.:Bringing robotics in classrooms. Robotics in STEM education: Redesigning the learning experience, pp. 3–31(2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1
8. Kazakoff, E., & Bers, M.:Programming in a robotics context in the kindergarten classroom: The impact on sequencing skills. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(4), pp.371–391 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.f
9. Bers, M. U.:Using robotic manipulatives to develop technological fluency in early childhood. Contemporary perspectives on science and technology in early childhood education, pp.105–125 (2008)
10. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M.:New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), pp.59–69 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
11. Chambers, J. M., Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., & Grove, S.:Scaffolding knowledge construction through robotic technology: A middle school case study. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, pp.55–70 (2007)
12. Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U.:The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), pp.245–255 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
13. Mataric, M. J.:Robotics education for all ages. In Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Accessible, Hands-on AI and Robotics Education (2004)
14. Benitti, F. B. V.:Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), pp.978–988 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
15. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., & Lirrete-Pitre, N.:Strategies used by elementary school children solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp.2851–2857 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.427
16. Castledine, A. R., & Chalmers, C.:LEGO Robotics: An authentic problem solving tool?. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(3) (2011)
17. Mauch, E.:Using technological innovation to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: Educators’ experiences with the LEGO mindstorms robotic invention system. The Clearing House, 74(4), pp.211–213 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650109599193
18. Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J.:Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of research on technology in education, 39(3), pp.229–243 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
19. Alimisis, D.:Robotics in education & education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education, pp. 7–14 (2012)
20. Tocháček, D., Lapeš, J., & Fuglík, V.:Developing technological knowledge and programming skills of secondary schools students through the educational robotics projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, pp. 377–381 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.107
21. Ennis, R. H.:A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), pp. 44–48 (1985)
22. Hatcher, D. L., & Spencer, L. A.:Reasoning and writing: From critical thinking to composition(2005)
DOI: 10.5840/inquiryct20132827
23. Sternberg, R. J.:Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement, and Improvement (1986)
24. Norris, S. P.:Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership, 8, pp. 40–45 (1985)
25. Semerci, Ç.:Eleştirel düşünme becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 28(127) (2003)
26. McMahon, G.:Critical thinking and ICT integration in a western australian secondary school. Journal of Educational Technology&Society, 12(4), pp. 269–281 (2009)
27. Beer, R. D., Chiel, H. J., & Drushel, R. F.:Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), pp. 85–92(1999)
https://doi.org/10.1145/303849.303866
28. Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 17(2), 160-166.
29. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A.:Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(1), pp. 39–103 (1995)
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
30. Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20238
31. Sullivan, F. R.:Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), pp. 373–394 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20238
32. Kasalak, İ.:Robotik Kodlama Etkinliklerinin Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Kodlamaya İlişkin Özyeterlik Algılarına Etkisi Ve Etkinliklere İlişkin Öğrenci Yaşantıları (Master’s thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü) (2017)
33. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U.:Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), pp. 325–346 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
34. Norton, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S.:Problem solving in a middle school robotics design classroom. Research in Science Education, 37(3), pp. 261–277 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9025-6
35. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., & Lirrete-Pitre, N.:Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp. 2851–2857 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.427
36. McMahon, G.:Critical thinking and ICT integration in a western australian secondary school. Journal of Educational Technology&Society, 12(4), pp. 269–281 (2009)
37. Petre, M., & Price, B.:Using robotics to motivate ‘back door’learning. Education and information technologies, 9(2), pp. 147–158 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60
38. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., & Lirrete-Pitre, N.:Strategies used by elementary school children solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp. 2851–2857 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.427
39. Liu, H., Sheng, J., & Zhao, L. (2022). Innovation of teaching tools during robot programming learning to promote middle school students’ critical thinking. Sustainability, 14(11), 6625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116625
40. Mincemoyer, C., Perkins, D. F., & Munyua, C. (2001). Youth Life skills evaluation project at Penn State. Instrument also cited by the CYFAR Life Skills Project. Texas A & M University.
41. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self‐determination theory perspective. Journal of personality, 62(1), 119-142.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
42. Ozkan, B. C. (2004). Using NVivo to analyze qualitative classroom data on constructivist learning environments. The qualitative report, 9(4), 589-603.
43. Beer, R. D., Chiel, H. J., & Drushel, R. F. (1999). Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 85-92
https://doi.org/10.1145/303849.303866
44. Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/1
45. Rim, H., Choi, I., & Noh, S. (2014). A study on the application of robotic programming to promote logical and critical thinking in mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 53(3), 413-434.
https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2014.53.3.413