Mattia Thibault, Valerio Perna, Antonio Opromolla
pp. 197 – 230, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-064-005)
Abstract
The importance of playfulness in the creation of cohesive and sustainable urban communities is being increasingly recognised not only in urban studies but also in other disciplines such as human-centered design, architecture and semiotics, which are devoting an increasing number of studies to the potential, the creation and the effects of various forms of playful interactions with urban spaces. This convergence of interests makes it urgent to find common concepts leading to a holistic understanding of the phenomenon. In this paper, authors with different backgrounds (semiotics, architecture and design) but with a common interest in urban playfulness initiate a multidisciplinary dialogue. Such dialogue was articulated in five phases – Exploration, Integration, Categorisation, Selection and Description – and produced a total of ten strong concepts. This list offers a platform for the understanding, study, and design of urban playfulness.
Keywords: urban play, semiotics, design, architecture.
References
1. Lynch, K.: The Image of the City, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press (1960)
2. Debord, G.: Introduction to a critique of urban geography, in Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings, pp. 23-27, Praxis (e)press (1955).
3. Stevens, Q.: The ludic city: exploring the potential of public spaces. Routledge (2007). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961803.
4. Borden, I.: Skateboarding and the city. A complete history. Bloomsbury Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474208420.
5. Ammendola, J. Masiani, B., Saavedra, C.: Experimental co-design with a ludic urban community. The safeguard of the identity of Vale do Anhangabaù as a skateboarding spot, in Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development, 7th ed., pp. 56–57 (2022).
6. Vanolo, A.: Cities and the Politics of Gamification, Cities, v. 74, pp. 320-326 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.021.
7. Ruis, E.: The New Ludic City: From hybrid play towards embedded play within urban spaces (2016).
8. Holloway, S.L., Valentine, G.: Children’s Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning (1st ed.). Routledge (2000) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017524.
9. Donoff, G., Bridgman, R.S.: The playful city: constructing a typology for urban design interventions, International Journal of Play, 6, pp. 294 – 307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.1382995.
10. Azali, N. N.: Urban-Gamification’as a Collaborative Placemaking Toolkit in Nighttime: Let’s Play the City. In Transforming Urban Nightlife and the Development of Smart Public Spaces, Global, pp. 94-113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7004-3.ch007.
11. Nijholt, A.: Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground, New York: Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3
12. Glas, R., Lammes, S., Lange, M., Raessens, J., Vries, I.: The Playful Citizen. Amsterdam University Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984523
13. Hassenzahl M.: Experience design: Technology for all the right reasons, Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics 3, 1, pp. 1–95 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02191-6_5.
14. Raessens, J.: Playful identities, or the ludification of culture. Games and Culture, 1(1), pp. 52-57 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281779.
15. Thibault, M.: Towards a typology of urban gamification. In: Proc. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1476–1485, (2019). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.179.
16. Hamari, J.: Gamification. Blackwell Pub, in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Malden, pp. 1-3 (2019). ttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1321.
17. Perna, V.: From smart cities to playable cities. Towards playful intelligence in the urban environment, in archi-DOCT. The e-journal the dissemination of doctoral research in architecture, Vol. 6 (1), pp. 51-62 (2018).
18. Perna, V.: L’attività ludica come strategia progettuale. Regole e libertà per una grammatica del gioco in architettura, Macerata: Quodlibet (2020). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19qmcd8
19. Höök, K., Löwgren, J.: Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3):23, pp. 1-18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371.
20. Sheppard, E., Gidwani, V., Goldman, M., Leitner, H., Roy, A., & Maringanti, A.: Introduction: Urban revolutions in the age of global urbanism, in Urban Studies, 52(11), pp. 1947-1961 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015590050.
21. Duke, R.: Metropolis: The urban systems game. New York: Gamed Simulations, Inc. (1975).
22. Maalsen, S.: The hack: What it is and why it matters to urban studies, in Urban Studies, 59(2), pp. 453-465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020986300.
23. Giovannella C.: Is complexity tameable ? Toward a design for the experience in a complex world. Interaction Design and architecture(s) IxD&A Journal, N. 15, pp.18-30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-015-002.
24. Leone, D.: U’Game–a toolkit for urban gaming. IxD&A Journal, N. 40, pp. 57-68, (2019). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-040-004.
25. Giovannella C.: From simplex to complex: designing for wellbeing at scale. Interaction Design and architecture(s) IxD&A Journal, N. 55, pp.123-138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-055-006.
26. Sennett, R: The Fall of Public Man. New York, NY: Knopf, (1976).
27. Carmona, M.: Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford; Boston, MA: Architectural Press (2003).
28. Harvey, D.: Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing (1996).
29. Hatuka, T.: Public space and public rituals: Engagement and protest in the digital age, Urban Studies, 60(2), pp. 379-392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221089770.
30. Barthes, R.: Sémiologie et urbanisme, L’aventure sémiologique, Paris : Seuil (1967).
31. Benveniste, E.: Deux modèles linguistiques de la cité, in Problèmes de linguistique générale 2, Paris : Gallimard (1970). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111560168-043.
32. de Certeau, M.: L’invention du quotidien. Paris: Gallimard, (1980).
33. Volli, U.: Laboratorio di Semiotica, Milano: Laterza (2005).
34. Murphy, J., McDowell, S.: Making sense of segregation: Transitional thinking and contested space, Urban Studies, vol. 60, no. 14, pp. 2835–2851(2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231161007.
35. McCarthy, D.: ‘I’ma Normal Person’1: An Examination of How Utilitarian Cyclists in Charleston South Carolina Use an Insider/Outsider Framework to Make Sense of Risks, Urban Studies, 48(7), pp. 1439-1455 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010375322.
36. Wallius, E., Thibault, M., Apperley, T., Hamari, J.: Gamifying the city: E-scooters and the critical tensions of playful urban mobility. Mobilities, 17(1), pp. 85-101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1985382.
37. P. Cervelli, P., Sedda, F.: Zone, frontiere, confini: la città come spazio culturale, in Senso e metropoli. Per una semiotica posturbana, G. Marrone and I. Pezzini, Eds. Roma: Meltemi, pp. 171–192 (2006).
38. Carmona, M.. Design coding and the creative, market and regulatory tyrannies of practice, Urban Studies, 46(12), 2643-2667 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344226.
39. Maas, W. G. M., Graafland, A. D., van Bilsen, A., Batstra, B., Castro, C. P., van Susteren, A. W. C.: Space Fighter. The evolutionary city (game). Barcelona: Actar-Distribution Inc. (2007).
40. Waldrop, M. M.: The necessity of knowledge, Science, 223, pp. 1279-1283 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.223.4642.1279.
41. Bateson, G.: Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2000) (1972). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001.
42. Bocchi, G., Cerruti, M.: La sfida della complessità, Torino: Mondadori Bruno (2007) (1985).
43. Portugali, J.: Complexity, cognition and the city. Springer Science & Business Media (2022).
44. Löw, M.: The city as experiential space: The production of shared meaning, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), pp. 894-908 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12022.
45. Neumüller, M.: Hypertext Semiotics in the Commercialized Internet, doctoral thesis, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Vienna: Diplom.de (2003).
46. Nekoui, Y., Roig, E.: Children and the Mediated City. Place Attachment Development Using Augmented Reality in Urban Spaces, IxD&A Journal, N 52, pp. 144 – 157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-008.
47. Jaskiewicz, T., Mulder, I., Morelli, N., Pedersen, J.S.: Hacking the hackathon format to empower citizens in outsmarting “smart” cities, IxD&A Journal, N 43, pp. 8-29 (2019-2020). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-043-001.
48. Wiethoff, A., Hoggenmueller, M., Rossm, B. Hirsch, L., Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M.: A Media Architecture Approach for Designing the Next Generation of Urban Interfaces, IxD&A Journal, N 48, pp. 9-32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-048-001.
49. Wang, B.: The Seductive Smart City and the Benevolent Role of Transparency, IxD&A Journal, N 48, pp. 100-121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-048-005.
50. Curtis, G., Opromolla, A.: Spazi urbani ibridi. Dall’introduzione del digitale ai processi sociali nella città, Ocula, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 38–55, (2019). https://doi.org/10.12977/ocula2019-21.
51. Luigini, A., Parricchi, M. A., Basso, A., & Basso, D.: Immersive and participatory serious games for heritage education, applied to the cultural heritage of South Tyrol, IxD&A Journal, N 43, pp. 42-67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-043-003.
52. Vesco, A., Di Dio, S., & Gastón, B.:Preface: Games for Urban Sustainability. IxD&A Journal, N 40, pp. 5-7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-040-001psi.
53. Thibault, M.: Ludosemiotica, il gioco tra segni, testi pratiche e discorsi. Rome: Aracne (2020).
54. Lotman, M.: The place of art among other modelling systems, Sign Systems Studies, vol. 39, no. 2/4, pp. 251–270, (2011). https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.10.
55. Henricks, T.S.: Foreword, in Play for Life: Play Theory and Play as Emotional Survival, B. Sutton Smith, ed., The Strong (2017)
56. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining” gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9-15 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040.
57. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2606315
58. de Neef, R.: Bread and games: pacifying rewards in gamified systems. academia. edu. (2013).
59. Huotari, K., & Hamari, J.: Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In: Proceeding of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference, pp. 17-22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2393132.2393137.
60. Kuutti, J. Designing gamification, master’s thesis, University of Oulu, Finland (2013).
61. Kumar, P., Felix, S., Addagada, T.: Leading Transformation through Gamification, Infosys Lab Briefings, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 47–54, (2013).
62. Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P., Schrape, N.: Rethinking Gamification, Lüneburg: Meson Press (2014).
63. Bonenfant, M., & Genvo, S.: Une approche située et critique du concept de gamification. Sciences du jeu, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.286.
64. Thibault M. & J. Hamari (2021) Seven Points to Reappropriate Gamification, in Spanellis A., Harviainen J.T. (eds) Transforming Society and Organizations through Gamification. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., pp. 11-28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68207-1_2.
65. Dragona, D.: Counter-gamification: emerging tactics and practices against the rule of numbers, in Rethinking Gamification, Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P., Schrape, N. (eds.) Lüneburg: Meson Press, pp. 227–250 (2014).
66. Bogost, I.: How to do things with videogames. U of Minnesota Press (2011). https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676460.001.0001.
67. Ferri, G., Coppock, P.: Serious Urban Games. From Play in the City to Play for the City, in: Tosoni, S., Tarantino, M., Giaccardi, C. (eds.) Media & the City. Urbanism, Technology and Communication, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 120-134 (2013).
68. Marczewski, A.: Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play: Gamification, Game Thinking and Motivational Design, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2015).
69. Turco F.: Flash mob. quando la performance diventa strumento di protesta, Lexia 13–14, Aracne, Rome, pp. 305–319 (2012)
70. Dix, A.: Designing for appropriation. In: Proceedings of HCI 2007 The 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference University of Lancaster, UK 21, pp. 1-4 (2007).
71. Aliaj, B., Dhamo, S., Shutina, D.: Between energy and the vacuum. Tirana: POLIS Press (2010).
72. Yen, B., Mulley, C., & Burke, M.:Gamification in transport interventions: Another way to improve travel behavioural change. Cities, 85, pp. 140-149 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.09.002.
73. Calafiore, A., Rapp, A. Gamifying the City: Pervasive Game Elements in the Urban Environment. In: Proc. Workshop on Fictional Game Elements (FGE@CHI PLAY), Austin, TX, USA, Oct. 2016, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1715, pp. 1–6 (2016). ceur-ws.org+3e-archivo.uc3m.es+3dl.acm.org+3.
74. Tang, Y., Franzwa, C., Bielefeldt, T., Jahan, K., Saeedi-Hosseiny, M. S., Lamb, N., Sun, S. Sustain City: Effective Serious Game Design in Promoting Science and Engineering Education. In Tan, W. H. (Ed.), Design, Motivation, and Frameworks in Game-Based Learning, pp. 57-91 (2019). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6026-5.ch003.
75. Arango-López, J., Gallardo, J. Gutiérrez, F.L., Cerezo, E., Amengual, E., Valera, R. (2017, September) Pervasive Games: Giving a Meaning Based on the Player Experience. In: Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. Article 9, pp. 1–4. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3123818.3123832.
76. Cesário, V., Nisi, V., Coelho, A.: ClueKing: Allowing Parents to Customize an Informal Learning Environment for Children. In: Serious Games, Interaction and Simulation – 6th International Conference (SGAMES 2016), Porto, Portugal, June 16–17, pp. 23–30, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51055-2_4.
77. Papangelis, K., Metzger, M., Sheng, Y., Liang, H., Chamberlain, A., Cao, T.: Conquering the city: understanding perceptions of mobility and human territoriality in location-based mobile games. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3130955.
78. Hinske, S., Lampe, M., Magerkurth, C., Röcker, C.: Classifying Pervasive Games: On Pervasive Computing and Mixed Reality, in Concepts and Technologies for Pervasive Games, vol. 1, Magerkurth C., and Röcker, C. (eds)., Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag, pp. 11–38 (2007).
79. Arnab, S.: Game Science in Hybrid Learning Spaces, Taylor & Francis Ltd (2020). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315295053.
80. Garrido, P.C., Miraz, G.M., Ruiz, I.L., Gómez-Nieto, M.Á.: Use of NFC-based pervasive games for encouraging learning and student motivation. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Near Field Communication (NFC), Hagenberg, Austria, pp. 32–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/NFC.2011.13.
81. Poslad, S.: Ubiquitous computing: smart devices, environments and interactions. John Wiley & Sons (2011).
82. Weiser, M.D.: Ubiquitous computing. In: Proc. 22nd ACM Computer Science Conference (CSC ‘94), Phoenix, AZ, USA, Mar. 1994, vol. 418, pp. 197530–197680 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/197530.197680.
83. Tokunaga E., Ayabe M., Kimura H., Nakajima T.: Lifestyle Ubiquitous Gaming: Computer Games Making Daily Lives Fun. In: Obermaisser R., Nah Y., Puschner P., Rammig F.J. (eds) Software Technologies for Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems. SEUS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4761, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 202-212 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75664-4_20.
84. Lévi Strauss, C.: L’efficacité symbolique, Revue de l’histoire des religions, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 5–27 (1949). https://doi.org/10.3406/rhr.1949.5632.
85. Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play. Game design fundamentals, Cambridge/London: MIT Press (2004).
86. Oldenburg, R.: Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the great good places at the heart of our communities. Boston: Da Capo Press (2001).
87. Glick, D.: Bottom-up urbanism: A survey of temporary use in Europe. Boston: Hart Howerton Community Fellowship (2012).
88. Graham, S., & Marvin, S.: Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge (2002). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202.
89. Krasny, E. The Right to Green. Practicing Spatial Justice. In Specifics: Discussing Landscape Architecture, Sörensen, C., Liedtke, K. (eds.) Berlin and Boston: JOVIS Verlag GmbH, pp. 130–140 (2014) [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783868598803-027
90. Dembski, F., Wössner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat, M., Yamu, C.: Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 2307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307.
91. Crowley, D.N., Breslin, J.G., Corcoran, P.M., Young, K.: Gamification of citizen sensing through mobile social reporting. In: 2012 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference, pp. 1–5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGIC.2012.6329849.
92. Ashtari, D., de Lange, M.: Playful civic skills: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Analyse Participatory Civic Games, Cities, v. 89, pp. 70-79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.022.
93. Devisch, O., Poplin, A., Sofronie, S.: The gamification of civic participation: Two experiments in improving the skills of citizens to reflect collectively on spatial issues, Journal of Urban Technology, 23(2), pp. 81–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102419.
94. Mayer, I. S.: The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: A review, Simulation & Gaming, 40(6), pp. 825-862 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109346456.
95. Poplin, A.: Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), pp. 195–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.10.003.
96. Tan, R., Portugali, J.: The Responsive City Design Game, in Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, Portugali, J., Meyer, H., Stolk, E., Tan, E. (eds.) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 369–390 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_20.
97. Tan, E.: Play the city: games informing the urban development. Hilversum: Jap Sam Books (2017).
98. Saggio, A.: Del gioco nel progetto e i rischi dell’insegnare. La ‘scacchiera’ come metodo di ricerca sintattica, antoninosaggio.blogspot.com (2012) [Online]. Available: https://antoninosaggio.blogspot.com/2012/09/del-gioco-nel-progetto-e-i-rischi.html. [Accessed: Jan. 23, 2019].
99. Kristo, S., Perna, V., Hoxha, K.: Tirana Plug-in River: Catalyst Playful Experiences to Revitalize Albanian Informal Settlements. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 432–444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_33.
100. Saggio, A.: Thoughts on a Paradigm Shift / Pensieri su un cambio di paradigma: The IT Revolution in Architecture / La Rivoluzione Informatica in architettura. Raleigh USA: Lulu.com (2020).
101. Alonso, L., Zhang, Y.R., Grignard, A., Noyman, A., Sakai, Y., Elkatsha, M., Doorley, R., Larson, K.: CityScope: A Data-Driven Interactive Simulation Tool for Urban Design. Use Case Volpe. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX, ICCS 2018, Morales, A., Gershenson, C., Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds.), Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 253-261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_27.
102. Stenros, J. The game definition game: A review. Games and culture, 12(6), pp. 499-520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016655679.
103. Jahan, N., Naveed, S., Zeshan, M., Tahir, M.A.: How to conduct a systematic review: a narrative literature review, Cureus, vol. 8, no. 11, p. e864, (2016). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.864.
104. Horlick-Jones, T., Sime, J.: Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 441-456 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006.
105. Meyrowitz J.: No Sense of Place. The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford University Press, New York (1985).
106. De Lange, M., De Waal, M.: The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, Springer Nature (2019). ttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3.
107. Floch, J.M.: Sémiotique, marketing et communication : Sous les signes, les stratégies, PUF, Paris (1990).
108. Greimas, A. J.: Du sens: essais sémiotiques. Paris: Seuil (1970).
109. Rousseau, J. J.: Julie ou la nouvelle Héloïse (1791).
110. Schmidt, P., Nack, F.: Urban Games and Storification. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Interactive Digital Storytelling, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 282–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_27.
111. Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens. A study of the play-element of culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1949) (1938).
112. Stenros, J.: In Defence of a Magic Circle: The Social, Mental and Cultural Boundaries of Play, Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147–185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.10.
113. Montola, M., Stenros, J. Waern, A.: Pervasive Games. Theory and Design. Experiences on the Boundary Between Life and Play. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2009). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780080889795.
114. Perry, F.: Urban gamification: Can Pokémon GO transform our public spaces. The Guardian (2016).
115. Humphreys, L.: Involvement shield or social catalyst: Thoughts on sociospatial practice of Pokémon GO, Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), pp. 15-19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916677864.
116. Aimar, F., Perna, V.: Tirana: la nuova vita della Piramide di Hoxha, Il Giornale dell’Architettura, pp. 1–6, (2023). [Online]. Available: [Online]. Available: https://ilgiornaledellarchitettura.com/2023/06/21/tirana la nuova vita della piramide di hoxha/.
117. Andreani, S., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R., Sayegh, A.: Reframing Technologically Enhanced Urban Scenarios: A Design Research Model Towards Human-Centered Smart Cities, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 142, pp. 15–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.028.
118. De Sá, T.H., Edwards, P., Pereira, R.H.M., Monteiro, C.A.: Right to the city and human mobility transition: The case of São Paulo, Cities, vol. 87, pp. 60–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.024.