Fabio Antonio Figoli and Lucia Rampino
pp. 258-285, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-069-012)
Abstract
This systematic review provides an overview of the academic discourse on human-AI (HAI) collaboration within the design discipline. The selected papers were analysed through action coding, encapsulating the papers’ approach—designing, evaluating, discussing, and structural coding, indicating the papers’ core topics— human creativity, training, specific tasks, collaborative environments, ethical concern, interaction, co-creation, communication, decision-making, trust, and team dynamics. The papers are analysed and visualised in a network based on their assigned codes, revealing their relationships to one another. This interpretative effort contributes to knowledge by developing a bottom-up coding approach to identify key discourse clusters within the rapidly evolving literature on HAI collaboration, defining and discussing such clusters, and recognising relevant trends in the debate. The review highlights a current emphasis on practically driven studies over critical and reflective ones, suggesting the need for more integrated approaches that combine both perspectives.
keywords: Human-AI collaboration, Human-AI interaction, Artificial intelligence, Design research, Design teams, Systematic review.
References
1. Buch V.H., Ahmed I., Maruthappu M.: Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities Br. J. Gen. Pract., 68, pp. 143–144 (2018). 10.3399/bjgp18X695213
2. Nagar Y., Malone T.: Making Business Predictions by Combining Human and Machine Intelligence in Prediction Markets ICIS 2011 Proceedings. p. Paper 20 (2011)
3. Wilson J.H., Daugherty P.R.: Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces Harv. Bus. Rev., (2018)
4. Figoli F.A., Rampino L., Mattioli F.: AI in design idea development: A workshop on creativity and human-AI collaboration DRS2022: Bilbao (2022). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.414
5. Holzinger A., Kargl M., Kipperer B., Regitnig P., Plass M., Muller H.: Personas for Artificial Intelligence (AI) an Open Source Toolbox IEEE Access, 10, pp. 23732–23747 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154776
6. Jokinen K., Watanabe K.: Boundary-Crossing Robots: Societal Impact of Interactions with Socially Capable Autonomous Agents in Salichs, M.A., Ge, S.S., Barakova, E.I., Cabibihan, J.-J., Wagner, A.R., Castro-González, Á., and He, H. (eds.) Social Robotics. vol. 11876. pp. 3–13. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_1
7. Seeber I., Waizenegger L., Seidel S., Morana S., Benbasat I., Lowry P.B.: Collaborating with Technology-Based Autonomous Agents: Issues and Research Opportunities SSRN Electron. J., (2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504587
8. Figoli F.A., Bruggeman R., Rampino L., Ciuccarelli P.: AI-against-design map: A systematic review of 20 years of AI-focused studies in design research Des. Stud., 96, pp. 101279 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2024.101279
9. Figoli F.A., Facchin A., Gobbo B., Mattioli F.: Richness and Ambiguity: Mapping Artificial Intelligence Labels in Human-AI Collaboration Research EKSIG 2025: DATA AS EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE AND EMBODIED PROCESSES. Design Research Society (2025). https://doi.org/10.21606/eksig2025.126
10. Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L., Gomez A.N., Kaiser Ł. ukasz, Polosukhin I.: Attention is All you Need Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)
11. Shi Y., Gao T., Jiao X., Cao N.: Understanding Design Collaboration Between Designers and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 7, pp. 1–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3610217
12. Yannakakis G.N., Liapis A., Alexopoulos C.: Mixed-initiative co-creativity 9th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Fort Lauderdale. pp. 1–8. Foundations of Digital Games (2014)
13. Kantosalo A., Toivonen H.: Modes for Creative Human-Computer Collaboration: Alternating and Task-Divided Co-Creativity Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2016). pp. 77–84 (2016)
14. Rizzi G., Bertola P.: Exploring the generative AI potential in the fashion design process: an experimental experience on the collaboration between fashion design practitioners and generative AI tools Eur. J. Cult. Manag. Policy, 15, pp. 13875 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2025.13875
15. Grabe I.: Towards a Framework for Human-AI Interaction Patterns in Co-Creative GAN Applications Proceeding of the 3rd Workshop on Human-AI Co-Creation with Generative Models (2022)
16. De Visser E.J., Peeters M.M.M., Jung M.F., Kohn S., Shaw T.H., Pak R., Neerincx M.A.: Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams Int. J. Soc. Robot., 12, pp. 459–478 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x
17. Liao Q.V., Gruen D., Miller S.: Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–15. ACM, Honolulu HI USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376590
18. Berberian B.: Man-Machine teaming: a problem of Agency IFAC-Pap., 51, pp. 118–123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.049
19. Pagliari M., Chambon V., Berberian B.: What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human–agent interactions through the lens of social agency Front. Psychol., 13, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444
20. Schneider Á., Csűrös D.: Towards Distributed Creativity: Understanding Generative AI in the Context of Design Philosophy and the Material Turn Exp. Knowl. EKSIG Conf. Ser., (2025). https://doi.org/10.21606/eksig2025.127
21. Simkute A., Tankelevitch L., Kewenig V., Scott A.E., Sellen A., Rintel S.: Ironies of Generative AI: Understanding and Mitigating Productivity Loss in Human-AI Interaction Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., 41, pp. 2898–2919 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2405782
22. Agogo D., Hess T.J.: “How does tech make you feel?” a review and examination of negative affective responses to technology use Eur. J. Inf. Syst., (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1435230
23. Caporusso N.: Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Emergence of Creative Displacement Anxiety: Review Res. Directs Psychol. Behav., 3, (2023). https://doi.org/10.53520/rdpb2023.10795
24. Doyle S., Senske N.: Digital provenance and material metadata: Attribution and co-authorship in the age of artificial intelligence Int. J. Archit. Comput., 16, pp. 271–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077118800887
25. Draxler F., Werner A., Lehmann F., Hoppe M., Schmidt A., Buschek D., Welsch R.: The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users do not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text but Self-Declare as Authors ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact, 31, pp. 25:1-25:40 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637875
26. Figoli F.A., Mattioli F., Rampino L.: FROM FASCINATED TO SCARED: AFFECTIVE RESPONSES OF DESIGNERS USING GENERATIVE AI IN THE DESIGN PROCESS 137 Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Prod. Des. Educ. EPDE 2025, pp. 211–216 (2025). https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2025.36
27. Luccioni A.S., Viguier S., Ligozat A.-L.: Estimating the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176B parameter language model J Mach Learn Res, 24, pp. 253:11990-253:12004 (2023)
28. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J.M., Akl E.A., Brennan S.E., Chou R., Glanville J., Grimshaw J.M., Hróbjartsson A., Lalu M.M., Li T., Loder E.W., Mayo-Wilson E., McDonald S., McGuinness L.A., Stewart L.A., Thomas J., Tricco A.C., Welch V.A., Whiting P., Moher D.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ, pp. n71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
29. Johnny Saldaña: The coding manual for qualitative researchers, SAGE Publ, Los Angeles, Calif., (2013)
30. Zhang X., Mao X., Yin Y., Chai C., Zhang T.: Melting Your Models: An Integrated AI-based Creativity Support Tool for Inspiration Evolution 2022 15th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID). pp. 97–101. IEEE, Hangzhou, China (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCID56505.2022.00029
31. Urban Davis J., Anderson F., Stroetzel M., Grossman T., Fitzmaurice G.: Designing Co-Creative AI for Virtual Environments Creativity and Cognition. pp. 1–11. ACM, Virtual Event Italy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465260
32. Koch J., Taffin N., Beaudouin-Lafon M., Laine M., Lucero A., Mackay W.E.: ImageSense: An Intelligent Collaborative Ideation Tool to Support Diverse Human-Computer Partnerships Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 4, pp. 1–27 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3392850
33. Song B., Soria Zurita N.F., Zhang G., Stump G., Balon C., Miller S.W., Yukish M., Cagan J., McComb C.: TOWARD HYBRID TEAMS: A PLATFORM TO UNDERSTAND HUMAN-COMPUTER COLLABORATION DURING THE DESIGN OF COMPLEX ENGINEERED SYSTEMS Proc. Des. Soc. Des. Conf., 1, pp. 1551–1560 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.68
34. Zhang G., Raina A., Cagan J., McComb C.: A cautionary tale about the impact of AI on human design teams Des. Stud., 72, pp. 100990 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.100990
35. Song B., Gyory J.T., Zhang G., Zurita N.F.S., Stump G., Martin J., Miller S., Balon C., Yukish M., McComb C., Cagan J.: Decoding the agility of artificial intelligence-assisted human design teams Des. Stud., 79, pp. 101094 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101094
36. Kang M.: The effects of agent activeness and cooperativeness on team decision efficiency: A computational simulation study using Team-Soar Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 65, pp. 497–510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.001
37. Schecter A., Hohenstein J., Larson L., Harris A., Hou T.-Y., Lee W.-Y., Lauharatanahirun N., DeChurch L., Contractor N., Jung M.: Vero: An accessible method for studying human–AI teamwork Comput. Hum. Behav., 141, pp. 107606 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107606
38. Viros-i-Martin A., Selva D.: A Framework to Study Human-AI Collaborative Design Space Exploration Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM). p. V006T06A052. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Virtual, Online (2021). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2021-67619
39. Arbiza Goenaga M.: A critique of contemporary artificial intelligence art: Who is Edmond de Belamy? AusArt, 8, pp. 51–66 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.21490
40. Lu B.: A theory of ‘authorship transfer’ and its application to the context of Artificial Intelligence creations Queen Mary J. Intellect. Prop., 11, pp. 2–24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2021.01.01
41. Long D., Jacob M., Magerko B.: Designing Co-Creative AI for Public Spaces Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. pp. 271–284. ACM, San Diego CA USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325504
42. Wu Z., Ji D., Yu K., Zeng X., Wu D., Shidujaman M.: AI Creativity and the Human-AI Co-creation Model in Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools. vol. 12762. pp. 171–190. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_13
43. Fu Z., Zhou Y.: Research on human–AI co-creation based on reflective design practice CCF Trans. Pervasive Comput. Interact., 2, pp. 33–41 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-020-00028-0
44. Amershi S., Weld D., Vorvoreanu M., Fourney A., Nushi B., Collisson P., Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Bennett P.N., Inkpen K., Teevan J., Kikin-Gil R., Horvitz E.: Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–13. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
45. Shergadwala M.N., El-Nasr M.S.: HUMAN-CENTRIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND CHALLENGES FOR ENABLING HUMAN-AI INTERACTION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN: AN INTERVIEW STUDY IDETC-CIE202, Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2021-69809
46. Tsiakas K., Murray-Rust D.: Using human-in-the-loop and explainable AI to envisage new future work practices Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. pp. 588–594. ACM, Corfu Greece (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3529190.3534779
47. Arzberger A., van der Burg V., Chandrasegaran S., Lloyd P.: Triggered: Using human-ai dialogue for problem understanding in collaborative design 34th Int. Conf. Des. Theory Methodol., 6, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-89273
48. Yang Q., Steinfeld A., Rosé C., Zimmerman J.: Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–13. ACM, Honolulu HI USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301
49. Jiang J., Karran A.J., Coursaris C.K., Léger P.-M., Beringer J.: A Situation Awareness Perspective on Human-AI Interaction: Tensions and Opportunities Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., pp. 1–18 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2093863
50. Lee S., Lee M., Lee S.: What If Artificial Intelligence Become Completely Ambient in Our Daily Lives? Exploring Future Human-AI Interaction through High Fidelity Illustrations Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., 39, pp. 1371–1389 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080155
51. Jang S., Nam K.-Y.: Utilization of Speculative Design for Designing Human-AI Interactions Arch. Des. Res., 35, pp. 57–71 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2022.05.35.2.57
52. Jing L., Hansen P., Chai C.: A framework of artificial intelligence augmented design support Hum.-Comput. Interact., 35, pp. 511–544 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1733576
53. Bansal G., Wu T., Zhou J., Fok R., Nushi B., Kamar E., Ribeiro M.T., Weld D.S.: Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445717
54. Jia S., Li Z., Chen N., Zhang J.: Towards Visual Explainable Active Learning for Zero-Shot Classification IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 28, pp. 791–801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114793
55. Gyory J.T., Song B., Cagan J., McComb C.: COMMUNICATION IN AI-ASSISTED TEAMS DURING AN INTERDISCIPLINARY DRONE DESIGN PROBLEM Proc. Des. Soc., 1, pp. 651–660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.65
56. Endsley M.R.: Supporting Human-AI Teams:Transparency, explainability, and situation awareness Comput. Hum. Behav., 140, pp. 107574 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107574
57. Wulff K., Finnestrand H.: Creating meaningful work in the age of AI: explainable AI, explainability, and why it matters to organizational designers AI Soc., (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01633-0
58. Schmager S., Sousa S.: A Toolkit to Enable the Design of Trustworthy AI in Stephanidis, C., Kurosu, M., Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G., Streitz, N., Konomi, S., Degen, H., and Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCI International 2021 – Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality, eXtended Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. vol. 13095. pp. 536–555. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021)
59. Jain R., Garg N., Khera S.N.: Adoption of AI-Enabled Tools in Social Development Organizations in India: An Extension of UTAUT Model Front. Psychol., 13, pp. 893691 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893691
60. Chong L., Zhang G., Goucher-Lambert K., Kotovsky K., Cagan J.: Human confidence in artificial intelligence and in themselves: The evolution and impact of confidence on adoption of AI advice Comput. Hum. Behav., 127, pp. 107018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107018
61. Chong L., Kotovsky K., Cagan J.: Are Confident Designers Good Teammates to Artificial Intelligence?: A Study of Self-Confidence, Competence, and Collaborative Performance Proc. Des. Soc., 2, pp. 1531–1540 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.155
62. Chong L., Raina A., Goucher-Lambert K., Kotovsky K., Cagan J.: Collaborative Design Decision-Making With Artificial Intelligence: Exploring the Evolution and Impact of Human Confidence in AI and in Themselves Volume 6: 34th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM). p. V006T06A021. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-88574
63. Zhang G., Raina A., Brownell E., Cagan J.: The Impact of a Strategy of Deception About the Identity of an Artificial Intelligence Teammate on Human Designers Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC). p. V03BT03A017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-88535
64. Zhang G., Chong L., Kotovsky K., Cagan J.: Trust in an AI versus a Human teammate: The effects of teammate identity and performance on Human-AI cooperation Comput. Hum. Behav., 139, pp. 107536 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107536
65. Figoli F.A., Rampino L., Mattioli F.: AI IN THE DESIGN PROCESS: TRAINING THE HUMAN-AI COLLABORATION DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th – 9th September 2022. The Design Society (2022). https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2022.61
66. van der Waa J., Verdult S., van den Bosch K., van Diggelen J., Haije T., van der Stigchel B., Cocu I.: Moral Decision Making in Human-Agent Teams: Human Control and the Role of Explanations Front. Robot. AI, 8, pp. 640647 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.640647
67. Yannakakis G.N., Liapis A., Alexopoulos C.: Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity
68.Lin Y., Guo J., Chen Y., Yao C., Ying F.: It Is Your Turn: Collaborative Ideation With a Co-Creative Robot through Sketch Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–14. ACM, Honolulu HI USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258
69. Karimi P., Davis N., Maher M.L., Grace K., Lee L.: Relating Cognitive Models of Design Creativity to the Similarity of Sketches Generated by an AI Partner Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. pp. 259–270. ACM, San Diego CA USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325488
70. Kim J., Maher M.L., Siddiqui S.: Studying the Impact of AI-based Inspiration on Human Ideation in a Co-Creative Design System (2023)
71. Chen T.-J., Krishnamurthy V.R.: Investigating a Mixed-Initiative Workflow for Digital Mind-Mapping J. Mech. Des., 142, pp. 101404 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046808
72. Lee B., Feldman B., Fu K.: Speech2Mindmap: Testing the Accuracy of Unsupervised Automatic Mindmapping Technology With Speech Recognition J. Mech. Des., 144, pp. 021401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052282
73. Zhang C., Kwon Y.P., Kramer J., Kim E., Agogino A.M.: Concept Clustering in Design Teams: A Comparison of Human and Machine Clustering J. Mech. Des., 139, pp. 111414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037478
74. Gyory J.T., Soria Zurita N.F., Martin J., Balon C., McComb C., Kotovsky K., Cagan J.: Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: A Data-Driven Approach to Real-Time Process Management During Complex Engineering Design J. Mech. Des., 144, pp. 021405 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052488
75. Gyory J.T., Kotovsky K., McComb C., Cagan J.: Comparing the Impacts on Team Behaviors Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Process Management in Interdisciplinary Design Teams J. Mech. Des., 144, pp. 104501 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054723
76. Bayrak A.E., McComb C., Cagan J., Kotovsky K.: A Differential Game Approach to Dynamic Competitive Decisions Toward Human-Computer Collaboration Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. p. V007T06A017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Anaheim, California, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97619
77. Bayrak A.E., McComb C., Cagan J., Kotovsky K.: A strategic decision-making architecture toward hybrid teams for dynamic competitive problems Decis. Support Syst., 144, pp. 113490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113490
78. Bayrak A.E., Sha Z.: Integrating Sequence Learning and Game Theory to Predict Design Decisions Under Competition J. Mech. Des., 143, pp. 051401 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048222
79. Raina A., McComb C., Cagan J.: Learning to Design From Humans: Imitating Human Designers Through Deep Learning J. Mech. Des., 141, pp. 111102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044256
80. Kim H., Lim Y.: Teaching-Learning Interaction: A New Concept for Interaction Design to Support Reflective User Agency in Intelligent Systems Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. pp. 1544–1553. ACM, Virtual Event USA (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462141
81. Kanlı E.: Assessment of Creativity: Theories and Methods in Jain, P. (ed.) Creativity – A Force to Innovation. IntechOpen (2021). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93971
82. Pattie M.: Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents Commun. ACM, 38, pp. 108–114 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219808
83. Rip A., Kemp R.: Technological change Human choice and climate change: Vol. II, Resources and Technology. pp. 327–399. Battelle Press (1998)
84. Charmaz K.: Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, Sage, Los Angeles, (2012)