Enes Can Kilic and Mehmet Ali Altin
pp. 96-112, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-069-005)
Abstract
Spatial representation is a cornerstone of the creative interior design industry, yet traditional static mediums often result in material waste and significant miscommunication between designers and occupants. This paper proposes an empirical evaluation framework that utilizes a user-centered mobile application prototype as a proof-of-concept to foster methodological dialogue through participatory design. Grounded in the emerging framework of Human-Building Interaction (HBI), the study evaluates how interactive digital tools can reduce cognitive load and enhance decision-making accuracy. Following an expert heuristic evaluation (N=3) that demonstrated substantial agreement (K=0.578), usability testing (N=10) based on ISO 9241-11 standards showed high effectiveness (90.2%) and efficiency (89.85%). A comparative pilot study indicated that mobile interactivity can enhance spatial comprehension and user agency within exploratory consultation settings compared to traditional static methods. By providing rigorous metrics for engagement, this research presents a scalable prototype that highlights both the potentials and accessibility barriers of digital-first workflows as digital catalysts in design practice.
keywords: Human-Building Interaction (HBI), Participatory Design, Mobile Augmented Reality, User Experience (UX), Sustainable Design Practices.
References
1. Alavi H.S., Churchill E., Lalanne D.: The Evolution of Human-Building Interaction: An HCI Perspective, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.32, 2017, pp. 3–6. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-032-001
2. Evans R.: The developed surface: An enquiry into the brief life of an eighteenth-century drawing technique. In: Building to drawing, MIT Press, 1997, pp. 195–232.
3. Riva G.: Virtual reality in psychotherapy: Review, Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 8(3), 2005, pp. 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.220
4. Shneiderman B.: Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (6th ed.), Pearson, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/25065.950626
5. Forlizzi J., Battarbee K.: Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of DIS ’04, ACM, 2004, pp. 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013152
6. Norman D.A.: The design of everyday things (Revised edition), Basic Books, 2013.
7. Lew P., Olsina L., Zhang L.: Quality, quality in use, actual usability and user experience as key drivers for web application evaluation. In: Web engineering, Springer, 2010, pp. 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13911-6_15
8. Besana N., Krogh P.G., Petersen M.G., Spallazzo D.: Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic Review, Sustainability, 16(17), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177486
9. Fry T.: Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, Berg, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350036079
10. Dunford A.: The interaction design competency framework: A tool to understand what industry wants from interaction design education, Chalmers University of Technology, 2016.
11. Nabil S., Kirk D.S., Ploetz T., Wright P.: Interior spaces as Organic User Interfaces: A survey of the field, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.32, 2017, pp. 28–37. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-032-002
12. Fernández Ruiz M., Ruiz D., Puente H.: Environmental visualization and exploration in mobile augmented reality games: redefining the spatial affordances, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.56, 2023, pp. 69–88. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-056-004
13. Greuter S., Polson D.: Centre for Digital Ecosystems: Designing for Environmental and Societal Regeneration, RMIT University, 2025.
14. Greuter S.: Designing virtual user experiences that shape real-world actions, Keynote address, RMIT University, 2025.
15. Alraouf A.A., Clarke S.F.: From pearling to skyscrapers: The predicament of sustainable architecture and urbanism in contemporary Gulf cities, Routledge, 2017.
16. Rosina E., Mattioli F.: More-Than-Human-Centered-Design and Self-Narration as Catalysts for fostering Sustainable Learning Ecosystems, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.64, 2025, pp. 141–168. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-064-003
17. Culén A.L., Niess J., Stevens N., Miklian J.: Democratic Technology Design, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.70, 2026.
18. Fleiss J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters, Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 1971, pp. 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
19. Landis J.R., Koch G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33(1), 1977, pp. 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
20. Nielsen J.: Success rate: The simplest usability metric, Nielsen Norman Group, 2001.
21. Pallasmaa J.: The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
22. Nikou S.A.: Designing and Representing Learning Itineraries: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.47, 2021, pp. 94–122. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-047-005
23. Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, Vol. 265, No. 3, 1991, pp. 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
24. Sanders, E. B. N., Stappers, P. J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
25. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007, pp. 493–502.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
26. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., Beale, R.: Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition). Prentice Hall, 2004.
27. Alavi, H. S., Churchill, E., Wiberg, M., Lalanne, D., Dalsgaard, P., Schieck, A. F. G., Rogers, Y.: Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI): Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 26, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309714
28. Ceschin, F., Gaziulusoy, I.: Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, Vol. 47, 2016, pp. 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002