Leyla Alipour and Punik Simoni
pp. 286-309, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-069-013)
Abstract
This study investigates the components affecting the choice of design tools in the ideation phase of architectural design, with a particular focus on students’ reluctance toward sketching. Through an open inquiry, we gathered insights from architecture students, educators, and practitioners on their preferences, experiences, and perceptions of tool selection. Our results show that tool preference in ideation is not only shaped by the inherent advantages and disadvantages of sketching or Computer-Aided Design (CAD) but also by personal characteristics, educational frameworks, and contextual dynamics. Rather than positioning tools in opposition, the results suggest that sketching and digital tools support different modes of engagement within this communicative process. Findings indicate that the optimal ideation tool varies by individual context, suggesting that effective design education should address diverse student needs, enabling a balance between digital proficiency and foundational sketching skills.
keywords: Design Ideation, Sketching, CAD Tools.
References
1. Cross N.: Forty years of design research, Design Studies, 28(1), pp. 1–4 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004
2. Glanville R.: Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics, Kybernetes, pp. 1173–1206 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710827238
3. Fischer T., Herr CM.: An introduction to design cybernetics, in Design cybernetics: Navigating the new, pp. 1–23, Springer, Cham (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18557-2_1
4. Stones C., Cassidy T.: Comparing synthesis strategies of novice graphic designers using digital and traditional design tools, Design Studies, 28(1), pp. 59–72 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.09.001
5. Alcaide-Marzal J., Diego-Más J. A., Asensio-Cuesta S., Piqueras-Fiszman B.: An exploratory study on the use of digital sculpting in conceptual product design, Design Studies, 34(2), pp. 264–284 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.09.001
6. Wojtczuk A., Bonnardel N.: Designing and assessing everyday objects: Impact of externalization tools and judges’ backgrounds, Interacting with Computers, 23(4), pp. 337–345 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.004
7. Lee S., Yan J.: The impact of 3D CAD interfaces on user ideation: A comparative analysis using SketchUp and Silhouette Modeler, Design Studies, 44, pp. 52–73 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.02.001
8. Robertson B., Radcliffe D.: Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design, Computer-Aided Design, 41(3), pp. 136–146 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.007
9. Iordanova I., Tidafi T., Guité M., De Paoli G., Lachapelle J.: Parametric methods of exploration and creativity during architectural design: A case study in the design studio, in CAADfutures 2009, pp. 423–439, Presses de l’Université de Montréal (2009)
10. Dawoud H. M., Al-Samarraie H., Zaqout F.: The role of flow experience and CAD tools in facilitating creative behaviors for architecture design students, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), pp. 541–561 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9294-8
11. Prats M., Lim S., Jowers I., Garner S. W., Chase S.: Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching, Design Studies, 30(5), pp. 503–520 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.002
12. Bilda Z., Gero J. S., Purcell T.: To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question, Design Studies, 27(5), pp. 587–613 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.002
13. Linsey J. S., Clauss E., Kurtoglu T., Murphy J., Wood K., Markman A.: An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods, Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(3), pp. 031008 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003498
14. Tversky B.: What do sketches say about thinking, in AAAI SS 2002, AAAI Technical Report SS-02-08 (2002)
15. Schon D. A., Wiggins G.: Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), pp. 135-156 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
16. Woodbury R. F., Burrow A. L.: Whither design space?, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM, 20(2), pp. 63–82 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060406060057
17. Baaki J. W.: Effects of Interdisciplinary Designers Reflecting-in-Action During Design, PhD Thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan (2014)
18. van der Lugt R.: How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings, Design Studies, 26(2), pp. 101–122 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.08.003
19. Dinar M., Shah J. J., Cagan J., Leifer L., Linsey J., Smith S. M., Hernandez N. V.: Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future, Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2), pp. 021–101 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029025
20. Mao X., Galil O., Parrish Q., Sen C.: Evidence of cognitive chunking in freehand sketching during design ideation, Design Studies, 67, pp. 1–26 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.009
21. Alipour L.: The perception of students’ pre-sketching by architecture educators, International Journal of Education through Art, 17(3), pp. 389–406 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00075_1
22. Tedjosaputro M. A., Shih Y. T., Niblock C., Pradel P.: Interplay of sketches and mental imagery in the design ideation stage of novice designers, The Design Journal, 21(1), pp. 59–83 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1395655
23. Thurlow L.: Designers Who Don’t Draw: An Investigation into Sketch Inhibition Among Undergraduate Designers, PhD Thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK (2019)
24. Booth J. W., Taborda E. A., Ramani K., Reid T.: Interventions for teaching sketching skills and reducing inhibition for novice engineering designers, Design Studies, 43, pp. 1–23 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.002
25. Jenkins E.: Drawn to design: Analyzing architecture through freehand drawing, Walter de Gruyter (2013) https://doi.org/10.1515/9783034610964
26. Alias M., Gray D. E., Black T. R.: Attitudes towards sketching and drawing and the relationship with spatial visualization ability in engineering students, International Education Journal, 3(3), pp. 165–175 (2002)
27. Bernal M., Haymaker J. R., Eastman C.: On the role of computational support for designers in action, Design Studies, 41, pp. 163–182 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.001
28. Fischer T.: Enablement or Restriction?, in CAADFutures 2007, pp. 585–598, Springer (2007) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6528-6_43
29. Rahimian F. P., Ibrahim R.: Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design, Design Studies, 32(3), pp. 255–291 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.10.003
30. Musta’amal A. H., Norman E., Hodgson T.: Gathering empirical evidence concerning links between computer-aided design (CAD) and creativity, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(2), pp. 53–66 (2009)
31. Alcaide-Marzal J., Diego-Mas J. A., Acosta-Zazueta G.: A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design, Design Studies, 66, pp. 144–176 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.003
32. Yamamoto Y., Nakakoji K.: Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), pp. 513–535 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.023
33. Bilda Z., Demirkan H.: An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media, Design Studies, 24(1), pp. 27–50 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7
34. Dubberly H., Pangaro P.: Cybernetics and design: Conversations for action, in Design Cybernetics: Navigating the New, pp. 85–99, Springer, Cham (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18557-2_4