An Exploration of a Social Robot as a Digital Shield for Law Enforcement Interviews: Designing a Prototype

Cryston Sahae, Shuyue Gu, Lige Yang, Elin A. Björling, Nichelle Song
pp.  144 – 163, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-061-005)

Abstract

Sexual assault (SA) is a pervasive societal issue, particularly affecting minors, women, and members of the TGQN (transgender, genderqueer, nonconforming) community. Widespread underreporting, fueled by a deep-seated mistrust of law enforcement, particularly among women, creates a formidable barrier, hindering survivors from seeking deserved justice and support. This paper presents the potential benefit of a social robot as a non-judgmental and supportive data-gathering technology, as a crucial tool in addressing the pervasive issue of retraumatization experienced by survivors of sexual assault during police interviews. The paper explores the preliminary design of social robots as digital shields, offering a supportive and non-judgmental space for survivors to disclose their experiences by analyzing the development process, user research, ideation, and concept testing of two robot prototypes: IRA and Pup. We underscore the potential for social robots and innovative technologies to enhance the support provided to survivors within the criminal justice system.

Keywords: Social robots, Human-robot interaction, Trauma, Retraumatization, Sexual assault support, Emotional support social robot

CRediT Author Statement. Cryston Sahae: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration. Shuyue Gu: Methodology, Visualization, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review and Editing. Lige Yang: Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review and Editing. Elin Björling: Supervision, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review and Editing. Nichelle Song: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, and Investigation.

References

1. Chivers-Wilson K. A.: Sexual Assault and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Review of the Biological, Psychological and Sociological Factors and Treatments, McGill Journal of Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2 (2020) doi:10.26443/mjm.v9i2.663.
2. Holly J.: Why Doesn’t She Just Report It?: Apprehensions and Contradictions for Women Who Report Sexual Violence to the Police, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 29, no. 1, pp. 36–59 (2017) doi:10.3138/cjwl.29.1.36.
3. Snyder H. N.: Ph.D. (n.d.). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement: Victim, Incident, and Offender Characteristics | Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/sexual-assault-young-children-reported-law-enforcement-victim
4. Cantor D. et al.: Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Misconduct (2019)
5. Morgan R. et al.: Criminal Victimization, 2019 (2020)
6. Monroe L., Kinney L., Weist M., Dafeamekpor D., Dantzler J., Reynolds M.: The experience of sexual assault: findings from a statewide victim needs assessment, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(7), pp. 767–776 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277100
7. Lorenz K. et al.: I Was Worried I Wouldn’t Be Believed: Sexual Assault Victims’ Perceptions of the Police in the Decision to Not Report, Violence and Victims, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 455–476 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1891/vv-d-20-00058. Accessed 26 July 2021.
8. Jacques-Tiura A. J., Tkatch R., Abbey A., Wegner R.: Disclosure of sexual assault: characteristics and implications for posttraumatic stress symptoms among African American and Caucasian survivors, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 11(2), pp. 174–192 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1080/15299730903502938
9. Webster WS, Oxburgh GE: Victims of sexual offences: aspects impacting on participation, cooperation and engagement with the interview process. Psychiatr Psychol Law (2021) 17;29(5):679-697. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1956387. PMID: 36148386; PMCID: PMC9487919.
10. Venema R. M.: Police Officer Schema of Sexual Assault Reports: Real Rape, Ambiguous Cases, and False Reports. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), pp. 872-899 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514556765
11. Kerstetter W. A. and Van Winkle B.: Who decides?, Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 268–283 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017003003.
12. Darling K.: The New Breed: What Our History with Animals Reveals about Our Future with Robots. Henry Holt and Company (2022)
13. Krause-Parello C.A., Thames M., Ray C.M., Kolassa J.: Examining the effects of a service trained facility dog on stress in children undergoing forensic interview for allegations of child sexual abuse, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 22(3) pp. 305-320 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1443303
14. Spruin E., Dempster T., Mozova K.: Facility dogs as a tool for building rapport and credibility with child witnesses, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 62: pp. 1-12 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100407
15. McDonald S.: Helping Victims Find their Voice: Testimonial Aids in Criminal Proceedings. Victims of Crime Research Digest, No. 11, at 5-13. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada. (2018)
16. Kothgassner O.D. et al: Virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A meta-analysis, European Journal of Psychotraumatology, vol. 10, no. 1 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1654782.
17. Lucas G. M., Gratch J., King A., Morency L. P.: It’s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose, Comput. Human Behav. 37, pp. 94–100 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.043
18. Pickard M. D., Roster C. A., Chen, Y.: Revealing sensitive information in personal interviews: is self-disclosure easier with humans or avatars and under what conditions?, Comput. Human Behav. 65, pp. 23–30 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.004
19. Laban G., Ben-Zion Z., Cross, E. S.: Social robots for supporting post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis and treatment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.752874
20. Social Robot. Social Robot – an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics, www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/socialrobot#:~:text=Computer%20Interaction%2C%202017-,Social%20Robots,et%20al.%2C%201999)  Accessed 30 Jan. 2024.
21. Hoffman G., et al.: Robot responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2014) https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559660.
22. Luo R. L. et al.: Social robots outdo the not-so-social media for self-disclosure: Safe machines preferred to unsafe humans?, Robotics, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 92 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11050092.
23. Uchida T. et al.: Japanese young women did not discriminate between robots and humans as listeners for their self-disclosure -pilot study-, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 35 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030035.
24. Björling E. A., Ling H., Bhatia S., Matarrese, J.: Sharing stressors with a social robot prototype: What embodiment do adolescents prefer?, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100252 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100252
25. Holthöwer J., van Doorn J.: Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(4), pp. 767-784 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00862-x
26. Pitardi V., et al.: Service Robots, Agency and Embarrassing Service Encounters, Journal of Service Management, vol. 33, no. 2 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-12-2020-0435.
27. Quori, www.quori.org/#index. Accessed 25 Jan. 2024.
28. Alves-Oliveira P. et al.: Flexi: A robust and flexible social robot embodiment kit, Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022) https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533541.
29. Harling G. et al.: Nonverbal response cards reduce socially desirable reporting of violence among adolescents in rural Burkina Faso: A randomized controlled trial, Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 914–921 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.006.
30. Busch V. et al.: The effect of deep and slow breathing on pain perception, autonomic activity, and mood processing—an experimental study, Pain Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 215–228 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01243.x.
31. Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 215–228, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01243.x
32. Alves-Oliveira P. et al.: Flexi: A robust and flexible social robot embodiment kit, Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022) https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533541.
33. Emar Robot Software Tools. EMAR Robot Frontend Tools, mayacakmak.github.io/emarsoftware/. Accessed 22 May 2024.
34. Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN, www.rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault#:~:text=%E2%80%9CI’m%20sorry%20this%20happened,%2C%E2%80%9D%20help%20to%20communicate%20empathy. Accessed 22 May 2024.

back to Table of Contents