Phygital Education through Storytelling and Learning by Doing: the Binario 9 ¾ project.

Fabio Sartori, Claudia Maga, Barbara Tosi, Alessandro Varallo
pp. 69 – 83, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-062-005)

Abstract

Alternatives didactic methods, based on the educational theory “learning by doing”, have been suggested in the transition from Curricula Based Education to Competence-Based Education (CBE). An example of alternative methods employed in this project is phygital education, which can be used as a profitable framework to implement innovative teaching method of STEM disciplines at school. In this paper we present a recent project, namely Binario 9 ¾, where phygital education has been developed through virtual communities of practice and digital storytelling adoption, to support students of middle school with learning disorders or difficulties to bridge the gap with others. The project was split into two phases: the first one from September 2019 till December 2021, characterized by COVID pandemic during which the developed materials have been mainly used in presence to support student with learning difficulties in mathematics due to language speaking; the second one from June 2022 to September 2023 during which the materials have been completely revised to be used online by students with specific learning disorders too (like dyslexia). The results reported in this paper show how inclusion, scholastic and educational success for students with learning disturbs or cultural barriers can be successfully obtained using the proposed approach.

Keywords: Competence-Based Education, Phygital Education, Digital Storytelling, Virtual Communities of Practice, Learning by doing.

CRediT Authors Statement. Fabio Sartori: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft preparation. Claudia Maga: Software, Validation, Writing – original draft preparation. Barbara Tosi: Supervision, Project Administration, Funding acquisition,  Writing – review and editing. Alessandro Varallo: Investigation, Data Curation, Resources, Writing – review and editing

References

1. Abfalter D., Zaglia M. E., & J. M.: Sense of virtual community: A follow up on its measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 400 – 404. (2012)
2. Albanese M. A.: Building a competency-based curriculum: the agony and the ecstasy. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 439-454 (2010)
3. Ali, A.: Exploring the Transformative Potential of Technology in Overcoming Educational Disparities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 2(1), 107-117 (2023)
4. Binario 9 e 3/4 project. (2023). Von https://www.binarionovetrequarti.eu/il-progetto/. abgerufen
5. Blanchard M.: The experienced sense of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database. (2004)
6. Brown D.: Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science (2001)
7. Chaturvedi S. P.: Effective Teaching Practices for Success During COVID 19 Pandemic: Towards Phygital Learning. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-10 (2021)
8. Chavis D. M., Hogge J. H., McMillan D. W. & Wandersman A. Sense of community through brunswik’s lens: A first look. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 24-40 (1986)
9. Chavis D., Lee K., & Acosta J.: The sense of community (sci) revised: The reliability and validity of the sci-2. 2nd international community psychology conference. Lisboa. (2008)
10. Di Luca M.: Un ambiente di calcolo evoluto per lo sviluppo del pensiero computazionale. Didamatica (2018)
11. Fadilah P. A.: Development of interactive media based on mathematics with HOMTS and learning by doing orientation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1806. No. 1. IOP (2021)
12. Farooq M. S.:Learning through Assistive Devices: A Case of Students with Hearing Impairment. Bulletin of Education and Research, 37(1), 1-17 (2015)
13. Gervais J.: The operational definition of competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 1(2), 98-106 (2016)
14. Ghamrawi N.: Teachers’ virtual communities of practice: A strong response in times of crisis or just another Fad? Education and information technologies, 27(5), 5889-5915 (2022)
15. INVALSI: Alunni stranieri in Italia: un’analisi attraverso i dati INVALSI (2018). Von https://www.invalsiopen.it/alunni-stranieri-risultati-prove-invalsi-2019/: https://www.invalsiopen.it/studenti-immigrati-inclusione/ abgerufen
16. Kumar A. & Rajagopal A.: Phygital math learning with handwriting for kids. Workshop on Math AI for Education (MATHAI4ED), 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021), (S. Paper 5) (2021)
17. Marisa D. L.: Un ambiente di calcolo evoluto per lo sviluppo del pensiero computazionale. Atti Convegno Nazionale DIDAMATICA 2018. AICA-Associazione Italiana per l’Informatica ed il Calcolo Automatico, 127-136 (2018)
18. Mulloy A. M.: Assistive technology for students with visual impairments and blindness. In G. S. Lancioni (Hrsg.), Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series (S. 113-156.). New York, NY: Springer (2014)
19. Murithi J. Y.: Teachers’ use of ICT in implementing the competency-based curriculum in Kenyan public primary schools. Innovation and Education, 3(1), 1-11 (2021)
20. Nel J.: The use of Competence Based Education and Training (CBET), Interactive Teaching Methods, Learning-by-Doing and Student Focused Teaching at Agricultural Colleges in South Africa (2009)
21. Ravanelli. F.: Una esperienza di Matematica e Digital Storytelling nella scuola (2011)
22. Sartori F., Maga C., Tosi B. & Varallo A.: Lurking Reduction at School Through Virtual Communities of Practice: The Binario 9 ¾ Project. International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Springer, Cham, 535-543 (2020)
23. Wambiri G. N.: KENYA PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PREPARATION IN ICT TEACHING: TEACHER BELIEFS, ATTITUDES, SELF-EFFICACY, COMPUTER COMPETENCE, AND AGE. African Journal of Teacher Education, 5(1) (2017) doi: https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v5i1.351
24. Wang Y. S.-c.: Using peer-to-peer technology for knowledge sharing in communities of practices. Decision Support Systems (2008)
25. Wesselink R. C.: Aspects of competence-based education as footholds to improve the connectivity between learning in school and in the workplace. Vocations and Learning 3.1, 19-38 (2010)
26. Yeow J. F.: Lurking: Legitimate or illegitimate peripheral participation? ICIS (2006)
27. Zhu, X. A.: Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and instruction 4.3, 137-166 (1987)

back to Table of Contents