Antonina Korepanova and Kai Pata
pp. 169 – 196, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-064-004)
Abstract
Visual art education has moved from the traditional studio model towards e-learning practices. This paper presents a comparative exploration of art education goals in research papers (N=48) and among visual art teachers in higher education (N=24), as well as the teaching patterns they use in online practice. We qualitatively analyzed research papers on art teaching goals and interviewed international higher-level visual arts art educators from different countries. The inductive analysis identified many visual art teaching goals and art teaching patterns the teachers used to reach their objectives in e-learning. The analysis connected the overarching learning objectives and art teaching patterns. The paper proposes a visualized model of art education objectives and patterns for art teaching in e-learning. By unveiling and categorizing art education patterns in e-learning mode, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between pedagogical strategies and the overarching goals of art education.
Keywords: educational objectives, teaching patterns, digitally mediated education, visual arts education.
References
1. Smith T.J.: Critically Reframing Post-Internet Art Toward the Future of Art Education Curriculum, Art Education, 73, pp. 38–44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1717821
2. Quinn R.D.: E-Learning in Art Education : Collaborative Meaning Making through Digital Art Production, Art Education, 64, pp. 18–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2011.11519132
3. Vartiainen H., Tedre M., Jormanainen I.: Co-creating digital art with generative AI in K-9 education: Socio-material insights, International Journal of Education Through Art, 19, pp. 405–423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00143_1
4. Vartiainen H., Tedre M.: Using artificial intelligence in craft education: crafting with text-to-image generative models, Digital Creativity, 34, pp. 1–21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557
5. Crowther P.: Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement, Journal of Learning Design, 6, pp. 18–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i3.155
6. Saghafi M.R., Franz J., Crowther P.: A holistic blended design studio model: A basis for exploring and expanding learning opportunities. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. pp. 844–852. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2012)
7. Mao L., Queiroz F.: Online education in design disciplines: factors influencing the interactive experience of group learning Int J Technol Des Educ, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09882-w
8. Burke K.: Virtual praxis: Constraints, approaches, and innovations of online creative arts teacher educators, Teaching and teacher education, 95, pp. 103143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103143
9. Kyei-Blankson L., Keengwe J.: Faculty-faculty interactions in online learning environments, Learning tools and teaching approaches through ICT advancements. pp. 127–135. IGI Global (2013). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2017-9.ch012
10. Slattery D.M.: Strategies for Designing Equitable, Accessible, and Effective Blended and Fully Online Education, Designing Equitable and Accessible Online Learning Environments. pp. 31–49. IGI Global (2024). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0268-2.ch002
11. Kebritchi M., Lipschuetz A., Santiague L.: Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46, pp. 4–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
12. Korepanova A., Pata K.: The Transformation of Art Teaching Process: A Qualitative Study of Digitally Mediated Teaching. In: Dascalu, M., Mealha, Ó., and Virkus, S. (eds.) Smart Learning Ecosystems as Engines of the Green and Digital Transition. pp. 151–165. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_9
13. Koehler M.J., Mishra P., Hershey K., Peruski L.: With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, pp. 25–55 (2004)
14. Juneja A., Turabieh H., Upadhyay H., Kiros Bitsue Z., Hoang V.T., Trung K.T.: Optimization of Mental Health-Related Critical Barriers in IoT-Based Teaching Methodology, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, pp. e4602072 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4602072
15. Wang Y., Devarajoo K.: Challenges Confronted in Online Teaching for Oil Painting Conservation and Restoration Course, IJEH, 2, pp. 28–32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v2i2.281
16. Cutcher A., Cook P.: One Must Also be an Artist: Online Delivery of Teacher Education, International Journal of Education and the Arts, (2016)
17. Mewburn I.: Lost in translation: Reconsidering reflective practice and design studio pedagogy, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11, pp. 363–379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210393912
18. Lee A.: Visual arts, untaught and unlearned. Quadrant, 53, pp. 52–58 (2009)
19. Mulholland N.: Paragogy, Re-imagining the Art School. pp. 99–120. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20629-1_6
20. Ammons M.: The Definition, Function, and Use of Educational Objectives, The Elementary School Journal, 62, pp. 432–436 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1086/460000
21. Bobbitt F.: The Objectives of Secondary Education, The School Review, 28, pp. 738–749 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1086/437303
22. Kliebard H.M.: The Tyler Rationale, The School Review, 78, pp. 259–272 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1086/442905
23. Abbadeni N., Ghoneim A., Alghamdi A.: Program educational objectives definition and assessment for quality and accreditation, International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 3, pp. 33–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v3i3.2777
24. Chudý Š., Jůvová A., Neumeister P., Snopková D.: Educational Aims as Key Components of Education (A Methateories Concept of Philosophy of Education in the East European Pedagogy), e-Pedagogium, 12, pp. 70–83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2012.051
25. Grace J.D.: Higher Education As A Profession: A Curriculum Analysis (Graduate, Professions), The University of Arizona, (1984)
26. Madaus G., Tyler R.W.: Educational Objectives: The Blueprint For Instruction And Evaluation, (2013)
27. Bloom B.S., Engelhart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., Krathwohl D.R.: Handbook I: cognitive domain, New York: David McKay, (1956)
28. Mager R.F., Peatt N.: Preparing instructional objectives, Fearon Publishers, Palo Alto, (1962)
29. Taba H., Spalding W.B.: Curriculum development: Theory and practice, Harcourt, Brace & World New York, (1962)
30. Mcavoy B.R.: How to Choose and Use Educational Objectives, Medical Teacher, 7, pp. 27–35 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598509036788
31. Segedinac M., Segedinac M., Konjović Z., Savić G.: A formal approach to organization of educational objectives, Psihologija, 44, pp. 307–323 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1104307S
32. Gagne R.M., Briggs L.J.: Principles of instructional design, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Oxford, England, (1974)
33. Gagne R.M.: Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American psychologist, 39, pp. 377 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.377
34. Gosling D., Moon J.: How to use learning outcomes and assessment criteria, SEEC London, (2002)
35. Jwan S.: Formulating Instructional Objectives and Learning Outcomes Curriculum Development and Evaluation: Curriculum Components in Action, 24, pp. 112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004717992_007
36. Kennedy D.: Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide, University College Cork, (2006)
37. Davies I.K.: A history of the objectives movement in education, EDRS PRICE, pp. 75 (1976)
38. Moseley D., Elliott J., Gregson M., Higgins S.: Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training British Educational Research Journal, 31, pp. 367–390 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500082219
39. Nayef E.G., Yaacob N.R.N., Ismail H.N.: Taxonomies of educational objective domain, International journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 3, pp. 165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i9/199
40. Gaševic D., Djuric D., Devedžic V.: Model driven engineering and ontology development, Springer Science & Business Media, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00282-3_4
41. Lawson B.: How designers think, Routledge, (2006). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979
42. Curedale R.: Design Thinking Process & Methods, 5th Edition, Design Community College Inc., (2022)
43. Gustafsson D.: Analysing the Double diamond design process through research & implementation (2019)
44. Tyrrell R.W.: An Appraisal of the Tyler Rationale, The School Review, 83, pp. 151–162 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1086/443181
45. Alexander C.: A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction, Oxford university press, (1977)
46. Bergin J., Eckstein J., Volter M., Sipos M., Wallingford E., Marquardt K., Chandler J., Sharp H., Manns M.L.: Pedagogical patterns: Advice for educators, Joseph Bergin Software Tools, (2012)
47. Eckstein J., Bergin J., Sharp H.: Patterns for active learning Proceedings of PloP. vol. 2002 (2002)
48. García-Peñalvo F.J., Seoane Pardo A.M.: Pedagogical Patterns and Online Teaching (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5832-5.ch015
49. Hadzhikolev E., Hadzhikoleva S., Hristov H., Yonchev E., Tsvetkov V.: Modeling of Pedagogical Patterns in an E-learning System, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16, pp. 205–219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i24.26775
50. Fioravanti M.L., Barbosa E.F.: A Catalog of Pedagogical Patterns for Learning Applications, 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). pp. 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658904
51. Angelova N., Kiryakova G.: Sharing good practices and solutions in e-learning through pedagogical patterns, 7th National Conference on e-learning in higher education, Borovets, Bulgaria. pp. 85–93 (2018)
52. Korepanova A., Pata K.: Pattern Elements in Higher Visual Art Education. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. pp. 99–106. (2023)
53. Bowen G.A.: Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative research journal, 9, pp. 27–40 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
54. Creswell J.W., Poth C.N.: Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Sage publications, (2016)
55. Yin R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, (2009)
56. McNiff S.: Opportunities and challenges in art-based research, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 4, pp. 5–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah.3.1.5_1
57. Bender D.M., Vredevoogd J.D.: Using online education technologies to support studio instruction, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9, pp. 114–122 (2006)
58. Brindley T., Doidge C., Willmott R.: Introducing alternative formats for the design project review, Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Profession, pp. 108–115 (2000)
59. Design Council: The Double Diamond, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/
60. Holly C., Legg T.J., Mueller D., Adelman D.S.: Online teaching: challenges for a new faculty role, J Prof Nurs, 24, pp. 254–258 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.07.003
61. Iftikhar N., Crowther P., Osborne Burton L.: Variance in student and teacher roles in the contemporary Australasian architecture design studio context, Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15, pp. 683–702 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-01-2021-0020
62. Dutton T.A.: Design and Studio Pedagogy, Journal of Architectural Education, 41, pp. 16–25 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
63. Hwang R.-L.: Five trends of school arts education reform in Taiwan, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25, pp. 175–181 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00482.x
64. Tomljenovic Z., Vorkapic S.T.: Constructivism in Visual Arts Classes, Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10, pp. 13–32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.913
65. Shreeve A., Sims E., Trowler P.: ‘A kind of exchange’: learning from art and design teaching, Higher Education Research & Development, 29, pp. 125–138 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903384269
66. Paloș R., Sava S.L., Vîrgă D.: The role of teacher support, students’ need satisfaction, and their psychological capital in enhancing students’ self-regulated learning, Studia Psychologica, 62, pp. 44–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2020.01.790
67. Li R., Che Hassan N., Saharuddin N.: Psychological Capital Related to Academic Outcomes Among University Students: A Systematic Literature Review, PRBM, Volume 16, pp. 3739–3763 (2023). https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S421549
68. Eilouti B.: A problem-based learning project for computer-supported architectural design pedagogy, Art, design & communication in higher education, 5, pp. 197–212 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.5.3.197_1
69. Choi H., Piro J.M.: Expanding Arts Education in a Digital Age, Arts Education Policy Review, 110, pp. 27–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.3.27-34
70. Schön D.A.: The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action, Journal of Architectural Education, 38, pp. 2–9 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345
71. Picciano A.G.: Online education: Foundations, planning, and pedagogy, Routledge, (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226750
72. Mason R.: The university – current challenges and opportunities. In: D’Antoni, S.(2006). The Virtual University. Models and Messages, UNESCO-IIEP, (2006)
73. Reffat R.: Revitalizing architectural design studio teaching using ICT: Reflections on practical implementations, International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 3, pp. 39–53 (2007)
74. Celentin P.: Online education: Analysis of interaction and knowledge building patterns among foreign language teachers, International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 21, pp. 39–58 (2007)
75. Karchmer-Klein R., Konishi H.: A mixed-methods study of novice teachers’ technology integration: Do they leverage their TPACK knowledge once entering the profession? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55, pp. 490–506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1976328
76. Jing Y., binti Omar J.: Integrating Digital Tools in Art Education: A Study of TPACK Development in Chinese Pre-Service Teachers International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13, (2024). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20016
77. Mutohhari F., Sutiman S., Nurtanto M., Kholifah N., Samsudin A.: Difficulties in Implementing 21st Century Skills Competence in Vocational Education Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10, pp. 1229–1236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22028
78. Spencer L.M., Spencer P.S.M.: Competence at Work models for superior performance, John Wiley & Sons, (2008)
79. Holubnycha L., Shchokina T., Soroka N., Besarab T.: Development of Competency-Based Approach to Education Educational Challenges, 27, pp. 54–65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2022.27.2.04