Article_snip

Ingrid Mulder, Alberto Magni
pp. 119 - 140, view paper, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-007), Google Scholar

Submitted on 15 Dec 2021 - Accepted on 15 Mar 2022

Interaction Design and Architecture(s) IxD&A Journal
Issue N. 52, Spring 2022

Abstract

An increasing number of social innovators are leveraging cities as urban learning ecosystems in order to experiment with design approaches to tackle societal challenges at a local level. However, the scale and complexity of these challenges force them to constantly acquire new capabilities to advance the local experimentation towards systemic change. We introduce co-design as a transformative community-driven design method to facilitate innovators to continuously identify, connect, co-define, and share with other peers their learning journeys to build capacity over time for addressing societal challenges. The current article elaborates upon a capacity-building framework that not only resulted in elaborate training activities for urban transformations, but also fostered a community of practice that was instrumental to self-sustain a learning network. Results highlight the importance of developing a collaborative learning infrastructure capable of expanding the pool of societal actors contributing to the further diffusion and co-creation of knowledge for urban transformations.

Keywords: Capacity building, Co-design, Collaborative learning, Learning ecosystem, Reflection, Self-development, Urban innovators, Urban transformations


Cite this article as:
Mulder I., Magni A.: A collaborative learning infrastructure to build capacity for urban transformations, Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.52, 2021, pp. 119–140, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-007

References:

1. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
2. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New York (2010).
3. Morris, L., Cruickshank, L.: New design processes for knowledge exchange tools for the New IDEAS project. In: Proceedings of the Knowledge Exchange: an interactive conference 2013 (2013).
4. Concilio, G., Tosoni, I.: Introduction. In: Concilio, G., Tosoni, I. (eds.) Innovation Capacity and the City. The enabling role of design, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, pp. 1-14. Springer, Cham (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00123-0_1
5. Concilio, G., Cullen J., Tosoni I.: Design Enabled Innovation in Urban Environments. In: Concilio, G., Tosoni, I. (eds.) Innovation Capacity and the City. The enabling role of design, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, pp. 85-101. Springer, Cham (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00123-0_5
6. Mulder, I., Magni, A.: Design and Engineering as agents of change: A capabilities framework. Forthcoming in: Proc. of EPDE 2022, International conference on engineering and product design education, 8–9 September 2022, London South Bank University, London, UK (in press)
7. Giovannella C.: At the Root of the Smart Cities: Smart Learning Eco-systems to train Smart Citizens. In: Fitsilis, P. (ed.) Building on Smart Cities Skills and Competences – Human factors affecting smart cities development, Springer (2022)
8. Mulder, I.: Sociable smart cities: Rethinking our future through co-creative partnerships. In: Proceedings of Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions, DAPI 2014, pp. 566-574. Springer (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07788-8_52
9. Rajagopal, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Van Bruggen, J., & Sloep, P. B.: Understanding personal learning networks: Their structure, content and the networking skills needed to optimally use them. First Monday, 17(1) (2011). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559
10. Schon, D.A.: Educating the reflective practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. The Jossey-Bass series in higher education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)
11. Gray, D.E.: Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management learning, 38(5), 495-517 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607083204
12. Helyer, R.: Learning through reflection: the critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-Applied Management, 7(1), 15-27 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003
13. Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), pp.425-437 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
14. Magni A., Calderón González A., Mulder I.: Supporting Urban Innovators’ Reflective Practice. In: Mealha Ó., Dascalu M., Di Mascio T. (eds) Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 249. Springer, Singapore (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3930-2_2
15. Mulder, I.: A pedagogical framework and a transdisciplinary design approach to innovate HCI education. IxD&A, 27, 115-128 (2015)
16. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., Kessels, J.: In search of reflective behavior and shared understanding in ad hoc expert teams. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 141-154 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104323024410
17. Designscapes.eu: Design-enabled Innovation Training Modules. Available online: https://designscapes.eu/dei-training-modules/ Retrieved April 30, 2022.

back to Table of Contents