Belinda J Dunstan, Guy Hoffman
pp. 98 - 116, view paper, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-061-003), Google Scholar
Issue N. 61, Summer 2024
Sculpture offers a centuries-long tradition of techniques for expressing emotion and movement in a static form. Insights from this field present an opportunity to design robots that express not only through movement, but also via dynamic cues in their static positions. Such cues can suggest motion potential, emotion, and character. This paper presents three principles identified in sculpture techniques that can be applied to robot design: (a) depicting exposure and protection of emotional pivot points in the body, (b) weight distribution, and (c) the revelation of movement mechanisms and tension through flexible skins. We employ the first two of these principles in an interactive design and motion control environment to demonstrate the potential for application to the design of social collaborative robots. We illustrate the third principle via a robot design that uses a flexible fabric skin stretched over rigid and elastic actuation elements. Using insights from sculpture can promote the design of robots from a transdisciplinary perspective by increasing the readability of robot intent and affect even when the robot is not actively moving.
CRediT author statement: Belinda J Dunstan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing, Project administration. Guy Hoffman: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing, Project administration
Cite this article as:
Dunstan B., Hoffman G.: Rethinking Bodily Expression in Human-Robot Communication: Insights from Sculpture., Interaction Design & Architecture(s) – IxD&A Journal, N.61, 2024, pp. 98–116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-061-003
References:
1. Zuckerman O., Hoffman G.: Empathy Objects: Robotic devices as conversation companions TEI 2015 – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2015) https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2688805
2. Fong T., Nourbakhsh I., Dautenhahn K.: A survey of socially interactive robots Rob Auton Syst, 42, pp. 143–166 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
3. Breazeal C.: Designing Sociable Robots, The MIT Press, (2004) https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2376.001.0001
4. Brooks A.G., Gray J., Hoffman G., Lockerd A., Lee H., Breazeal C.: Robot’s play: interactive games with sociable machines Computers in Entertainment, 2, pp. 74–83 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1145/1027154.1027171
5. Lütkebohle I., Hegel F., Schulz S., Hackel M., Wrede B., Wachsmuth S., Sagerer G.: The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head “Flobi” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3384–3391. IEEE (2010)
6. Gockley R., Bruce A., Forlizzi J., Michalowski M., Mundell A., Rosenthal S., Sellner B., Simmons R., Snipes K., Schultz A.C.: Designing robots for long-term social interaction 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. (IROS 2005). pp. 1338–1343 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2005.1545303
7. Sharma M., Hildebrandt D., Newman G., Young J.E., Eskicioglu R.: Communicating affect via flight path Exploring use of the Laban Effort System for designing affective locomotion paths Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. pp. 293–300 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483602
8. Jacobsson M., Ljungblad S., Bodin J., Knurek J., Holmquist L.E.: GlowBots: robots that evolve relationships ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. p. 7. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007) https://doi.org/10.1145/1278280.1278288
9. Velonaki M., Rye D., Scheding S., Williams S.: Fish-Bird: Autonomous Interactions in a New Media Arts Setting Vital Signs: Creative Practice & New Media Now. RMIT Publishing, Melbourne, Vic. (2005)
10. Hoffman G., Ju W.: Designing Robots with Movement in Mind J Hum Robot Interact, 3, pp. 89 (2014) https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Hoffman
11. Coulson M.: Attributing Emotion to Static Body Postures: Recognition Accuracy, Confusions, and Viewpoint Dependence J Nonverbal Behav, 28, pp. 117–139 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONB.0000023655.25550.be
12. Bretan M., Hoffman G., Weinberg G.: Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 78, pp. 1–16 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.006
13. Persohn L.: Curation as methodology Qualitative Research, 21, pp. 20–41 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120922144
14. Bjerregaard P.: Introduction: Exhibitions as research Exhibitions as Research. pp. 1–16 (2019) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627779-1
15. Holland O.: Grey Walter: The pioneer of real Artificial Life Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Artificial Life. pp. 34–44. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1997)
16. Guizzo, E. HiBot Demos New Amphibious Snake Robot. IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News, (2013).
17. Wada K., Shibata T.: Robot therapy in a care house – its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. pp. 3966–3971. IEEE
18. Hoffman G., Bauman S., Vanunu K.: Robotic experience companionship in music listening and video watching Pers Ubiquitous Comput, 20, (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0897-1
19. Hoffman G., Kubat R., Breazeal C.: A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor RO-MAN 2008 – The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. pp. 354–359. IEEE (2008) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600691
20. Cooper S., Di Fava A., Vivas C., Marchionni L., Ferro F.: ARI: the Social Assistive Robot and Companion 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). pp. 745–751. IEEE (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223470
21. Pandey A.K., Gelin R.: A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 25, pp. 40–48 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157
22. Beck A., Cañamero L., Bard K.A.: Towards an Affect Space for robots to display emotional body language 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. pp. 464–469 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598649
23. Summers D.: Contrapposto: Style and Meaning in Renaissance Art Art Bull, 59, pp. 336–361 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1977.10787440
24. Janson H.W., Janson A.F.: History of Art: The Western Tradition, Peason Prentice Hall, (2003)
25. Andrew Stewart: Hellenistic Freestanding Sculpture From The Athenian Agora, Part 1: Aphrodite Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 81, (2012) https://doi.org/10.2972/hesperia.81.2.0267
26. Igarashi T., Matsuoka S., Tanaka H.: Teddy: A Sketching Interface for 3D Freeform Design ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses. pp. 11–es. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2006) https://doi.org/10.1145/1185657.1185772
27. Balasubramanian R., Dollar A.M.: Variation in compliance in two classes of two-link underactuated mechanisms 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3497–3504 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979660
28. Hoffman G., Zuckerman O., Hirschberger G., Luria M., Shani Sherman T.: Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. vol. 2015- March (2015) https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696495
29. Matsumoto M.: Fragile Robot: The Fragility of Robots Induces User Attachment to Robots International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, pp. 536–541 (2021) https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.10.10.536-541
30. Rus D., Tolley M.T.: Design, fabrication and control of soft robots Nature, 521, pp. 467–475 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543
31. Hu Y., Hoffman G.: What Can a Robot’s Skin Be? Designing Texture-Changing Skin for Human–Robot Social Interaction J. Hum.-Robot Interact., 12, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3532772
32. Bachmann I.: Reimagining Robots in Dunstan Belinda J. and Koh, J.T.K.V. and T.T.D. and B.S.A. (ed.) Cultural Robotics: Social Robots and Their Emergent Cultural Ecologies. pp. 67–74. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_4
33. Suguitan M., Hoffman G.: Blossom: A Handcrafted Open-Source Robot J. Hum.-Robot Interact., 8, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3310356