Erkki Rötkönen, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Naska Goagoses, Tariq Zaman, Helvi Itenge, Daniel Yong Wen Tan, Erkki Sutinen
pp. 81 – 100, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-005)
Abstract
Emerging technologies and new pedagogies, such as design-based learning, have the potential to revolutionize formal education systems. We postulate that smart learning ecosystems can be co-created through connecting schools and students across the globe to co-design their own virtual learning spaces by exploiting new affordances offered by digital technologies. This paper presents a Hybrid model for Design-Based learning (HyDe), which guides co-located and online design-based learning activities with geographically distributed students. It was conceptualized within a case study, wherein 63 students aged 11 to 13 from three schools in Namibia, Malaysia, and Finland collaboratedon co-designing a virtual space to share local perspectives on global challenges. The HyDe model was refined based on reflections from the case study yielding in a model which can be integrated in school curricula across the globe, thereby creating a smart connected learning ecosystem.
Keywords: co-design, children, Finland, Namibia, Malaysia, remote interactions, distributed co-design, design-based learning
References
1. Teräs M., Suoranta J., Teräs H., Curcher, M.: Post-covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market, Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), pp. 863 – 878 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
2. Costa, C., Hammond, M., Younie, S.: Theorising technology in education: An introduction, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(4), pp. 395 – 399 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1660089
3. Constantin A., Alexandru C., Korte J., Wilson C., Fails J.A., Sim G., J. Read J.C., Eriksson, E.: Distributing participation in design: Addressing challenges of a global pandemic, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100255 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100255
4. Lindsay J.: Connecting beyond the classroom – move from local to global learning modes, Scan, 36, pp. 1–22 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.217412
5. Winschiers-Theophilus H., Goagoses N., Rötkönen E., Zaman, T.: Pushing political, cultural, and geographical boundaries: Distributed co-design with children from Namibia, Malaysia and Finland, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 100439 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100439.
6. Krummheuer, A., Rehm, M., Lund, M., Nielsen, K., Rodil, K.: Reflecting on co-creating a smart learning ecosystem for adolescents with congenital brain damage. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development, pp. 11 – 18. SLERD (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_2
7. Pasov, I., Dascalu, M., Nistor, N., Trausan-Matu, S.A.: Automated prediction of student participation in collaborative dialogs using time series analyses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development, pp. 177 – 185. SLERD (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_16
8. Giovannella C., Rehm, M.: A critical approach to ict to support participatory development of people centered smart learning ecosystems and territories, Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, 1(1), (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21325
9. Sharma, B., Nand, R., Naseem, M., Reddy, E., Narayan, S.S., Reddy, K.: Smart Learning in the Pacific: Design of New Pedagogical Tools. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, pp 573 – 580. IEEE (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615269
10. Spector, J.M.: Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments, Smart learning environments, 1(1), pp. 1–10 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7
11. Saadatmand, M., Kumpulainen, K.: Emerging technologies and new learning ecologies: Learners’ perceptions of learning in open and networked environments. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on networked learning, pp. 266–275. (2012)
12. Dascalu M.-D., Ruseti S., Dascalu M., McNamara D.S., Carabas M., Rebedea T., Trausan-Matu, S.: Before and during covid-19: A cohesion network analysis of students’ online participation in moodle courses, Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106780 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780
13. Facer K.: Learning futures: Education, technology and social change, Routledge, (2011) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817308
14. Giovannella, C.: Smart learning eco-systems: ‘fashion’ or ‘beef’?, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 10 (3), pp. 15-23 (2014)
15. Zhang F., Markopoulos P., Bekker, T.: Children’s emotions in design-based learning: A systematic review, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29 (4), pp. 459–481 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09830-y
16. Puente S.M.G., van Eijck M., Jochems, W.: A sampled literature review of design based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23 (3), pp. 717–732 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9212-x
17. Zhang F., Markopoulos P., An P., Schüll, M.: Social sharing of task-related emotions in design-based learning: Challenges and opportunities, International Journal of Child Computer Interaction (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100378
18. Scheer A., Noweski C., Meinel, C.: Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17 (3) (2012)
19. Thoring, K., Müller, R.M.: Understanding design thinking: A process model based on method engineering. In: DS 69: Proceedings of E and PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, pp. 493–498. (2011)
20. Doppelt Y., Mehalik M.M., Schunn C.D., Silk E., Krysinski, D.: Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context, Journal of Technology Education, 19 (2), pp. 22-39 (2008)
21. Lahti H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen P., Hakkarainen, K.: Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing, Design Studies, 25, pp. 351–371 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.001.
22. Dillenbourg P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning?, in Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19, Elsevier, Oxford, (1999)
23. Ke, F.: An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing, Computers & education, 73, pp. 26-39 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010.
24. Bekker T., Bakker S., Douma I., Van Der Poel J., Scheltenaar, K.: Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, pp. 29-38 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.001.
25. Sanders E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, CoDesign, 4 (1), pp. 5-18 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
26. Kinnula M., Iivari, N.: (2021). Manifesto for children’s genuine participation in digital technology design and making, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100244 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100244.
27. Walsh, G., Druin, A., Guha, M.L., Bonsignore, E., Foss, E., Yip, J.C., Golub, E., Clegg, T., Brown, Q., Brewer, R., Joshi, A., Brown, R.: DisCo: A co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 11–19. ACM (2012) https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307099
28. Walsh, G., Foss, E.: A case for intergenerational distributed co-design: The online Kidsteam example. In: Proceedings of IDC 2015: The 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 99–108 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771850
29. Walsh, G., Donahue, C., Pease, Z.: Inclusive co-design within a three-dimensional game environment. In: Proceedings of IDC 2016 – The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 1–10. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930721
30. Lee, K.J., Roldan, W., Zhu, T.Q., Saluja, H.K., Na, S., Chin, B., Zeng, Y., Lee, J.H., Yip, J.: The show must go on: a conceptual model of conducting synchronous participatory design with children online. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1 – 16. ACM (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445715
31. Itenge, H., Islas Sedano, C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H.: Virtually escaping lock down – co-designing a mixed reality escape room narrative with Namibian learners. In: Proceedings of the Third African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Inclusiveness and Empowerment, pp. 103 -112. ACM (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3448696.3448700
32. Rötkönen, E., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Goagoses, N., Itenge, H., Shinedima, G., Sutinen, E.: Playing on the globe: Facilitating virtual communications between Namibian and Finnish learners to co-design an interactive map game. In: Proceedings IDC’21 Interaction Design and Children, pp. 160–170. ACM (2021) https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460707
33. Kang, L., Jackson, S.J., Sengers, P.: Intermodulation: improvisation and collaborative art practice for hci. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM (2018) https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173734
34. Emmler T., Frehe-Halliwell, P.: The epistemological relevance of case studies as narratives in design-based research, EDeR. Educational Design Research, 4(1), (2020) https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.4.1.1453
35. Bernard R.M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K.: Computer conferencing: An environment for collaborative project-based learning in distance education, Educational Research and Evaluation, 7 (2-3), pp. 241–261 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.2.241.3866
36. Sanders E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, Codesign, 4 (1), pp. 5–18 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
37. Frauenberger C., Good J., Fitzpatrick G., Iversen, O.S.: In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design, International journal of human-computer studies, 74, pp. 93–106 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004.