Anders Kluge and Marlene Hasle
pp. 90 – 109, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-058-004)
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) has been shown to have a positive effect on motivation and learning. Yet, reviews of such findings continue show that AR research is being conducted within a narrow scope of learning processes. The current qualitative, exploratory case study took place in a primary school, where pupils aged 10–11 years used AR technology to summarise a learning session. The study applies a socio-constructive perspective focusing on active and collaborative learning to investigate the process. Detailed interaction analysis of talk and activities was used to investigate the extent to which and how the pupils used an AR application to integrate knowledge from the learning session. The findings show that the pupils expanded issues, made relations between them and put them into a larger context in a way that can be characterised as a process of integrating knowledge.
Keywords: Augmented Reality, Learning Processes, Primary School, Qualitative Method
References
1. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2016.11.002
2. Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education – cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400
3. Care, E. (2018). Twenty-First Century Skills: From Theory to Action. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
4. Cheng, J. C. P., Chen, K., & Chen, W. (2017). Comparison of marker-based AR and markerless AR: A case study on indoor decoration system View project. https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0231
5. Chiang, F. K., Shang, X., & Qiao, L. (2022). Augmented reality in vocational training: A systematic review of research and applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.107125
6. Chiang, T.-H.-C. H. C., Yang, S.-J.-H. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students’ Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural. This Article of the Journal of Educational Technology and Technology, 17(4), 106.
7. Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2013). The Knowledge Integration Perspective. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch27
8. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
9. diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342945
10. diSessa, A. A. (2014). The Construction of Causal Schemes: Learning Mechanisms at the Knowledge Level. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 795–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12131
11. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
12. Ferguson, C., van den Broek, E. L., & van Oostendorp, H. (2020). On the role of interaction mode and story structure in virtual reality serious games. Computers & Education, 143, 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103671
13. Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2019.04.001
14. Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of Augmented Reality in Informal Science Learning Sites: a Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-018-9734-4/TABLES/1
15. Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.05.002
16. Ivanova, G., Aliev, Y., & Ivano, A. (2014). Augmented Reality Textbook for Future Blended Education. International Conference on E-Learning’14.
17. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
18. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates inc.
19. Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51(4), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003
20. Kluge, A., & Bakken, S. M. (2010). Simulation as Science Discovery: Ways of Interactive Meaning-Making. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(3), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206810000876
21. Kuru Gönen, S. İ., & Zeybek, G. (2022). Using QR code enhanced authentic texts in EFL extensive reading: A qualitative study on student perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2039–2057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10695-w
22. Lu, Su-Ju & Liu, Ying-Chieh (2015) Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
23. Liestøl, G., Bendon, M., Hadjidaki-Marder, E., Bruno, F., Davidde, B., Kalamara, P., Kourkoumelis, D., & Ricca, M. (2021). Augmented Reality Storytelling Submerged. Dry Diving to a World War II Wreck at Ancient Phalasarna, Crete. Heritage 2021, 4(4), 4647–4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/HERITAGE4040256
24. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction. Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge.
25. Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
26. Majeed, Z. H., & Ali, H. A. (2020). A review of augmented reality in educational applications. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, 7(62), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2019.650068
27. Mazzuco, A., Krassmann, A. L., Reategui, E., & Gomes, R. S. (2022). A systematic review of augmented reality in chemistry education. Review of Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/REV3.3325
28. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D (12), 1321–1329.
29. Norman, D. A. (1978). Notes Toward a Theory of Complex Learning. In Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2535-2_5
30. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic books.
31. Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18, 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
32. Rochlen, L. R., Levine, R., & Tait, A. R. (2017). First Person Point of View Augmented Reality for Central Line Insertion Training: A Usability and Feasibility Study. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 12(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000185
33. Schön, D. A. (1984). The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345
34. Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2020). Augmented reality in STEM education: Aa systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
35. Yegorina, D., Armstrong, I., Kravtsov, A., Merges, K., & Danhoff, C. (2021). Multi-user geometry and geography augmented reality applications for collaborative and gamified STEM learning in primary school. Review of Education, 9(3), e3319. https://doi.org/10.1002/REV3.3319
36. Yousef, A. M. F. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCAL.12536
37. Zhang, J., Liu, T. C., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Using Augmented Reality to Promote Homogeneity in Learning Achievement. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality – Media, Art, Social Science, Humanities and Design, ISMAR-MASH’D 2015, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-MASHD.2015.17
38. Zhang, J., Ogan, A., Liu, T. C., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2016). The Influence of using Augmented Reality on Textbook Support for Learners of Different Learning Styles. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2016, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2016.26