Neil Potnis and Lola Ben-Alon
pp. 168 – 193, download
(https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-060-007)
Abstract
Natural building materials are critical to the future of a decarbonized built environment. Involving low-carbon and readily available materials such as clay-richsoils and plant fibers in building processes employ a range of techniques, and hence, a range of environmental and visual features, from rammed earth to cob and light straw clay. However, despite their advantages, natural materials are not represented in mainstream construction, perceived mistakenly as poor in theirperformance, low-tech, and are missing representation in training for building professionals. This research develops a digital representations-study of naturalmaterial futures and their associated embodied carbon. It links, for the first time, computational play, and critical data with traditional recipes of designing with natural materials. A digital tool for sustainable engagement was developed by utilizing a geological database of locally available soil-based repositories. As an exploratory design tool, it was tested through 24 playtests for its mechanics, graphical user interface, and perception shifts among designers and researchers. The final outcome seeks to establish a digital foundation for a more comprehensive earthen materials knowledge tool and life-cycle assessment. As a final deliverable, this work aims to unveil the strength of simulative material representations in heightening the knowledge base of an overlooked, historic, and sustainable practice.
Keywords: Earthen materials; Media arts; Computational play; Life-cycle assessment; Embodied carbon; Sustainability design.
References
1. Moncaster, Alice, and Katie Symons. “A Method and Tool for ‘Cradle to Grave’ Embodied Carbon and Energy Impacts of UK Buildings in Compliance With the New TC350 Standards.” Energy and Buildings, vol. 66, Elsevier BV, Nov. 2013, pp. 514–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.046.
2. Carcassi, Olga Beatrice, Guillaume Habert, Laura Elisabetta Malighetti, and Francesco Pittau. “Material Diets for Climate-Neutral Construction.” Environmental Science & Technology 56, no. 8 (April 4, 2022): 5213–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05895.
3. Asensio, Omar Isaac, and Magali A. Delmas. “The Effectiveness of US Energy Efficiency Building Labels.” Nature Energy 2, no. 4 (March 27, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.33.
4. Vigovskaya, Alina, Olga Aleksandrova, and Boris Bulgakov. “Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a LEED Certified Building.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 365 (June 1, 2018): 022007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899x/365/2/022007.
5. Carlisle, Stephanie, Brook Waldman, Meghan Lewis, and Kathrina Simonen. “2021 Carbon Leadership Forum Material Baseline Report (Version 2).” Material Baselines 2 (July 1, 2021). https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/47141.
6. Ben-Alon, L., Loftness, V., Harries, K. A., & Hameen, E. C. (2021). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building assemblies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 110951.
7. Reddy, B. V. Venkatarama. “Sustainable Materials for Low Carbon Buildings.” International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 4, no. 3 (September 1, 2009): 175–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctp025.
8. Kim, Min Soo, and Jungyeop Shin. “The Pedagogical Benefits ofSimCityin Urban Geography Education.” The Journal of Geography 115, no. 2 (March 3, 2016): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2015.1061585.
9. Méndez, Maria Do Carmo López, Angélica González Arrieta, Marián Queiruga Dios, Ascensión Hernández Encinas, and Araceli Queiruga Dios. “Minecraft as a Tool in the Teaching-Learning Process of the Fundamental Elements of Circulation in Architecture.” In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Nature, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47364-2_71.
10. Greenwald, Amy, and Michael L. Littman. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Learning and Computational Game Theory.” Machine Learning 67, no. 1–2 (May 1, 2007): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-007-0770-1.
11. Ben-Alon, L., Loftness, V., Harries, K. A., & Hameen, E. C. (2021). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building assemblies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 110951.
12. Ben-Alon, L., Loftness, V., Harries, K. A., DiPietro, G., & Hameen, E. C. (2019). Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building materials: A case study on cob earthen material. Building and Environment, 160, 106150.
13. Mateus, Ricardo, Jorge M.O. Fernandes, and Encarnação Teixeira. “Environmental Life Cycle Analysis of Earthen Building Materials.” In Elsevier EBooks, 63–68, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11459-6.
14. Ben-Alon, L., & Rempel, A. R. (2023). Thermal comfort and passive survivability in earthen buildings. Building and Environment, 110339.
15. Araki, Hiroyuki, Junichi Koseki, and Takeshi Sato. “Tensile Strength of Compacted Rammed Earth Materials.” Soils and Foundations 56, no. 2 (April 1, 2016): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.003.
16. Chandel, Shyam Singh, Vandna Sharma, and Bhanu M. Marwah. “Review of Energy Efficient Features in Vernacular Architecture for Improving Indoor Thermal Comfort Conditions.” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 65 (November 1, 2016): 459–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.038.
17. Benjamin, David. Embodied Energy and Design: Making Architecture Between Metrics and Narratives. Lars Müller Publishers, 2017.
18. Mears, Alison, and Jonsara Ruth, eds. Material Health: Design Frontiers. Lund Humphries, 2023. https://healthymaterialslab.org/blog/announcing-material-health- design-frontiers-publication.
19. Torres, Maruja, and Joseli Macedo. “Learning Sustainable Development with a New Simulation Game.” Simulation & Gaming 31, no. 1 (March 1, 2000): 119–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687810003100112.
20. Gabel, Medard. “Buckminster Fuller And the Game of the World.” Encyclopedia of the Future 33, no. 10 (June 1, 1996). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-5448.
21. Moriset, Sébastien, Bakonirina Rakotomamonjy, and David Gandreau. “Can Earthen Architectural Heritage Save Us?” Built Heritage 5, no. 1 (November 10, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00041-x.
22. Schröer, Christoph, Felix Kruse, and Jorge Marx Gómez. “A Systematic Literature Review on Applying CRISP-DM Process Model.” Procedia Computer Science 181 (January 1, 2021): 526–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.199.
23. Hammond, Geoffrey, and Craig Jones. “Embodied Carbon.” Edited by Fiona Lowrie and Peter Tse. The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE). BSRIA, 2011. http://www.emccement.com/pdf/Full-BSRIA-ICE-guide.pdf.
24. Ekaputra, Glenn, Charles Ci Wen Lim, and Kho I Eng. “Minecraft: A Game as an Education and Scientific Learning Tool.” ISICO 2013 2013 (January 1, 2013). http://is.its.ac.id/pubs/oajis/index.php/file/download_file/1219.